Division · No. 54Tuesday, 3 December 2024Commons Taxation

National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Second Reading

332
Ayes
189
Noes
Passed · Government won
127 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 3 December 2024 to give a Second Reading (initial parliamentary approval) to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill, which would increase the rate of employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15% from April 2025, while simultaneously lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying the tax and doubling the employment allowance from £5,000 to £10,500. The bill passed by 332 votes to 189, with the government carrying the vote comfortably. The bill is the legislative mechanism for one of the central tax measures announced in the October 2024 Budget. It raises revenue that the government says will fund an additional £22.6 billion in NHS resource spending, including 40,000 extra elective appointments per week, as well as supporting wider public service investment. The increase affects employers across the economy, though the government argues that the doubled employment allowance means over half of all employers will pay the same or less than before, and that 865,000 employers will pay no employer National Insurance at all in the following year. Critics argue the measure will suppress wages, cost jobs, and push some businesses, charities, hospices, and social care providers into financial difficulty. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 297 Labour MPs and 32 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the bill. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, Green, and DUP member who voted opposed it. Three independents voted in favour and four against. The Conservatives moved a reasoned amendment declining to give the bill a Second Reading on the grounds that it broke Labour's manifesto commitment and would reduce growth, wages, and employment. The bill sits within a broader legislative programme that also included the Finance Bill, which subsequently passed its Third Reading in March 2025 by 339 votes to 172.

Voting Aye meant
Support raising employer National Insurance contributions as a necessary measure to fix public finances and fund public services without directly cutting workers' take-home pay
Voting No meant
Oppose raising employer National Insurance, arguing it will reduce employment, suppress wages, and place undue burden on small businesses, charities and voluntary organisations
§ 01Who voted how.521 voting members · 127 absent
Aye333No189DID NOT VOTE · 127

521 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 127 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
297
0
65
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
92
24
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
63
9
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
32
0
10
Independent
3
4
7
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
James MurraySupportiveEaling North
Defends the Bill as necessary to fix public finances and fund NHS; argues it protects working people (no income tax/VAT/employee NI rises) and small businesses (via doubled employment allowance to £10,500), while businesses with broadest shoulders must contribute.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,810 words)
Richard FullerOpposedNorth Bedfordshire
Opposes the Bill as breaking Labour's manifesto promise; argues it is a regressive 'jobs tax' that will suppress wages, reduce employment, and harm small businesses, charities, GPs, and hospices without justification.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,610 words)
Daisy CooperOpposedSt Albans
Opposes the measure as undermining growth; calls for exemptions for health and care providers; urges consideration of alternative revenue sources (bank tax, gambling duty, digital services tax) that target the wealthy rather than businesses.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,469 words)
Dave DooganOpposedAngus and Perthshire Glens
Challenges the Government distinction between pay packets and suppressed wages/lost jobs; notes Scottish hospitality faces particular hardship without business rates relief unlike England.SNP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,568 words)
Luke MurphySupportiveBasingstoke
Supports the Bill as delivering record NHS investment (£25.6bn), teacher recruitment, and school rebuilding; argues Opposition want services without paying for them and lack credible alternatives.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,539 words)
Paul WaughSupportiveRochdale
Defends the Bill in context of Conservative failure; highlights the £22bn fiscal black hole and need to avoid austerity; attacks Opposition for inconsistency (they voted for health levy in 2021).Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,279 words)
Stuart AndersonOpposedSouth Shropshire
Opposes as breaking manifesto; reports constituents in hospitality cannot see viable path forward; questions whether Government understood the fiscal situation during transition period.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,002 words)
Ben LakeQuestioningCeredigion Preseli
Concerned about impact on Welsh public services (30% workforce in public sector, £380m cost); seeks assurance that reimbursement to local authorities will be full and recurring.Plaid Cymru · Voted no · Read full speech (1,408 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0