Division · No. 112Monday, 3 March 2025Commons Taxation

Finance Bill: Third Reading

339
Ayes
172
Noes
Passed · Government won
138 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

Parliament passed the Finance Bill at its Third Reading on 3 March 2025, by 339 votes to 172. The Bill gives legal effect to the measures announced in the October 2024 Budget, including increases to capital gains tax, changes to inheritance tax relief, higher business rates for certain sectors, VAT on private school fees, and an increase to the energy profits levy on oil and gas companies. Third Reading is the final stage in the House of Commons before a bill moves to the House of Lords, and a successful vote at this stage represents full Commons approval of the legislation. The Finance Bill translates the Government's tax and spending decisions into law. Its passage means that higher rates of capital gains tax, revised inheritance tax thresholds affecting family businesses and farms, and the removal of VAT exemptions for private schools will all come into force. The energy profits levy on North sea oil and gas producers rises to 78% in headline terms, with investment allowances removed. These measures raise revenue intended to fund public services, including a stated commitment to invest in special educational needs provision and affordable housing. The changes affect a wide range of people: small business owners, farmers, parents with children in private schools, pensioners, and workers in the energy sector. The vote followed strict party lines. All 331 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted in favour. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted against. The Green Party's four MPs voted with the Government. There were no notable rebels on either the Government or opposition benches. The Conservatives framed the Bill as damaging to growth, citing falling Bank of England forecasts and rising unemployment. The Liberal Democrats focused on the absence of impact assessments for measures affecting small businesses and private school pupils with special educational needs. The Bill sits within a broader legislative push that also includes the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill, which cleared related Commons votes in late March 2025.

Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Finance Bill and the government's tax and spending plans, including the income tax threshold freeze and VAT on private school fees
Voting No meant
Oppose the Finance Bill, with concerns including the impact of the income tax threshold freeze on state pensioners and other measures in the Bill
§ 01Who voted how.511 voting members · 138 absent
Aye339No172DID NOT VOTE · 138

511 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 138 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
295
0
67
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
91
25
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
60
12
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
36
0
6
Independent
3
2
9
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0
7
2
Reform UKWhipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
2
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes Finance Bill measures including state pension tax, energy profits levy hike, and VAT on independent schools; seeks impact reviews to expose harm to pensioners, businesses, and energy security.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,995 words)
Dr Jeevun SandherSupportiveLoughborough
Supports Finance Bill as necessary to ensure economic growth benefits are shared fairly across all income levels, demographics, and regions; backs investments in skills, housing, and childcare.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,075 words)
Daisy CooperQuestioningSt Albans
Seeks impact assessments on SMEs, households, alcohol duty impacts on distilleries/wine trade, and SEND pupils without EHCPs; opposes VAT on private schools but requests evidence of harm.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,711 words)
Jim DicksonSupportiveDartford
Defends Finance Bill as fixing an unfair tax system inherited from 14 years of Conservative government; argues most requested data already published; dismisses new clauses as duplicate work.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,061 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Condemns Bill as breaking manifesto promises, punishing businesses through NI hikes, attacking farmers with inheritance tax, and stifling growth; calls for impact assessments of damage.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,064 words)
Nesil CaliskanSupportiveBarking
Supports Bill's non-dom changes, energy profits levy, and VAT on private schools as fair taxation choices; backs long-term stability in energy markets alongside immediate price relief.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (864 words)
Mr Paul KohlerOpposedWimbledon
Opposes VAT on private schools; warns of adverse impacts on SEND pupils and wine industry; criticises impractical alcohol duty regime creating 30 different duty rates for wine.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,434 words)
Jim ShannonOpposedStrangford
Supports new clauses 2, 7, 8 as impact assessments; warns of VAT harm to faith schools and distilleries in Northern Ireland; opposes NI contributions rise.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (1,123 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0