Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
174
Ayes
—
340
Noes
Defeated · Government won
133 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on whether to exempt private schools with significant numbers of military families from losing their charitable business rates relief. The amendment, New Clause 2, was tabled at Report Stage of the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill and would have protected schools where a high proportion of pupils come from armed forces households. The vote was defeated by 340 votes to 174. The bill removes the charitable rates relief that private schools have historically enjoyed, meaning they will pay full business rates alongside the VAT changes introduced separately. The proposed exemption would have created a carve-out specifically for schools serving military communities, where service personnel often use private boarding schools because frequent postings and relocations make consistent state schooling difficult. Defeat of the amendment means the rates changes will apply to those schools equally, potentially increasing costs for families who rely on the Continuity of Education Allowance, a Ministry of Defence grant designed to support the children of serving personnel. The vote split almost entirely along party lines. All 302 Labour MPs and 35 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while all 97 voting Conservatives, all 64 voting Liberal Democrats, and all 6 voting Reform UK members supported it. The cross-party support for the exemption among opposition parties is notable given how rarely Conservatives and Liberal Democrats vote together. Seven independents also voted in favour. The bill continued through Parliament, with related Lords amendment votes in March 2025 showing the government successfully resisting further attempts by the House of Lords to modify the legislation, suggesting the government's position on universal application of the policy held firm throughout the bill's passage.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring a formal government review of the new business rates multipliers to assess their real-world impact on businesses
Voting No meant
Oppose mandating a statutory review, trusting the government's approach to business rates reform without an additional review requirement
514 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 133 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
302
60
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
97
0
19
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
35
7
Independent
7
2
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
1
—
Supports permanent business rates reduction for retail/hospitality/leisure but demands impact assessments and broader reform including manufacturing; opposes VAT on private schools.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,142 words) →
Warns of unintended consequences: small businesses could be 80% worse off while big chains like Starbucks gain 40% under the scheme; calls for differential impact assessment.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (649 words) →
Supports Bill as common-sense rebalancing favouring local independents over online giants; cites expert evidence that Bill benefits 98% of retail stores and has marginal impact on private schools.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (798 words) →
Opposes removal of private school charitable relief and business rate rises; cites closure of Carrdus school (120 pupils); seeks amendment to delay implementation and protect SEND schools.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (993 words) →
Criticises Bill as smoke-and-mirrors: cuts to relief offset by higher multipliers; raises will hit major employers (supermarkets, hotels, NHS); revaluation will compound increases; seeks review via New Clause 2.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,052 words) →
Defends Bill as essential to support high streets and fund state education; rejects amendments as diluting support; private schools are businesses and should pay rates like any other.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,083 words) →
Argues Bill harms SMEs, data centres, breweries, zoos, and stadiums; contradicts Labour's pre-election promise to abolish business rates; removal of private school relief harms state schools via lost facility-sharing.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,532 words) →
Backs Bill as fair and necessary; private schools are businesses and should contribute; focuses on high street support and equity in education funding for state sector.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,028 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0