Written questions by Lowe.

Whether her Department monitors how safeguarding disclosures made by asylum seekers relating to alleged criminal incidents prior to arrival in the UK are handled by local police forces.

Awaiting answer.

What information‑sharing arrangements are in place between UK and French authorities regarding safeguarding disclosures made by asylum seekers relating to alleged criminal incidents prior to their arrival in the UK.

Awaiting answer.

Whether she has considered designating the handling of pre‑arrival safeguarding disclosures from asylum seekers as a national responsibility.

Awaiting answer.

What mechanisms exist for national authorities to refer safeguarding disclosures made by asylum seekers to the relevant authorities in France where appropriate.

Awaiting answer.

What steps her Department is taking to ensure consistency in how police forces handle safeguarding disclosures made by asylum seekers relating to alleged criminal incidents outside the UK.

Awaiting answer.

Whether alternative arrangements were considered for foreign nationals seeking to attend the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026 before decisions were taken to refuse entry.

Awaiting answer.

Whether she plans to publish the risk assessments underpinning decisions to refuse entry to foreign nationals intending to attend the “Unite the Kingdom” rally on 16 May 2026.

Awaiting answer.

Whether consideration was given to allowing entry to foreign nationals attending the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026 subject to conditions and restrictions.

Awaiting answer.

Whether foreign nationals refused entry to attend the “Unite the Kingdom” rally on 16 May 2026 were given prior notice of that decision.

Awaiting answer.

What assessment she has made of the consistency of the application of the “not conducive to the public good” threshold across different immigration decision‑making processes.

The Home Secretary has the power to exclude a person who is not a British citizen if their presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good. The Immigration Rules also provide for the refusal of Electronic Travel Authorisations, entry clearance or permission at the border if a person’s character, conduct or associations mean it is undesirable to grant them entry to the UK.Decisions to exclude a person or refuse or cancel Electronic Travel Authorisations, permission on the grounds that their presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good are made in accordance with published policy, which can be accessed via the following links:Exclusion from the UK – decisions and orders: caseworker guidance - GOV.UK,Electronic Travel Authorisation Guidance,Grounds for refusal or cancellation of entry clearance: caseworker guidance - GOV.UK.

Whether she plans to publish the risk assessments underpinning decisions to refuse entry to foreign nationals intending to attend the “Unite the Kingdom” rally on 16 May 2026.

Awaiting answer.

What guidance her Department provides to officials on the meaning of the term “not conducive to the public good” in decisions to refuse leave to enter or remain in the UK.

The Home Secretary has the power to exclude a person who is not a British citizen if their presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good. The Immigration Rules also provide for the refusal of Electronic Travel Authorisations, entry clearance or permission at the border if a person’s character, conduct or associations mean it is undesirable to grant them entry to the UK.Decisions to exclude a person or refuse or cancel Electronic Travel Authorisations, permission on the grounds that their presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good are made in accordance with published policy, which can be accessed via the following links:Exclusion from the UK – decisions and orders: caseworker guidance - GOV.UK,Electronic Travel Authorisation Guidance,Grounds for refusal or cancellation of entry clearance: caseworker guidance - GOV.UK.

Under which powers foreign nationals were refused entry to the UK to attend the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026.

Awaiting answer.

Whether refusals of entry relating to the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026 were made on an individual basis.

Awaiting answer.

What assessment her Department made of the use of conditional entry, including restrictions on activity or location, as an alternative to refusing entry to foreign nationals intending to attend the “Unite the Kingdom” rally on 16 May 2026.

Awaiting answer.

What criteria were used to determine whether foreign nationals should be denied entry to the UK in connection with the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026.

Awaiting answer.

What routes of (a) appeal and (b) review were available to foreign nationals refused entry in connection with the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026.

Awaiting answer.

Whether her Department sought legal advice on decisions to refuse entry to foreign nationals intending to attend the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026.

Awaiting answer.

Whether records are held of discussions between Ministers and officials regarding the decisions to refuse entry to foreign nationals in connection with the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026; and whether she plans to publish those records.

Awaiting answer.

What assessment she has made of the potential impact of refusing entry to foreign nationals attending the Unite the Kingdom rally on 16 May 2026 on freedom of expression.

Awaiting answer.