The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 361 contributions

Speeches by Shastri-Hurst.

Every Hansard contribution by Neil Shastri-Hurst this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 4160 of 361 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 3 of 19Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623)

Ms Ashurst, local authorities have the right to refuse a placement of a child in a secure home. On what grounds would that child be refused? Can you also set out roughly what percentage are refused annually?

37
21 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623)

Within the secure home estate, you have welfare placements where they often involve children who are a high risk to themselves, whether that is through self-harm or other means. You have justice placements that are potentially children who are high risk to others. How do you manage that balance within the same space?

53
21 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623)

Would that trigger any specific safeguarding protocols if they are under 12, for example?

14
21 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623)

I think you said in your earlier evidence that you do not have anyone as young as 10 at the moment—

21
21 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623)

—but you can take them?

5
21 Apr 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1623)

I take the message you are saying that this is very low. You have given an example that they may go to a secure mental health bed. Of those who are refused, albeit there were none in the last year, what proportion are then pushed into the YOI or the STC estate, where perhaps they are the ones with the most complex need

73
16 Apr 2026NHS Federated Data Platform

If the hon. Gentleman will forgive me, I will not. I want the Minister to have sufficient time to respond to the multiple contributions there have been today. I ask the Minister the following questions. How are the Government ensuring that the NHS is not locked into a single supplier over the long term? What is the pla

healthtechnologyeconomy-jobs
364
16 Apr 2026NHS Federated Data Platform

I was expecting a promotion there, Dame Siobhain. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship. I congratulate the hon. Member for Newton Abbot (Martin Wrigley) on securing the debate. He has brought forward an issue that sits right at the centre of how we shape the future of our national health service: how we us

healthtechnologyeconomy-jobs
905
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. Before I start, I should probably put it on record that I am on the RARO—Regular Army Reserve of Officers—list as a former Regular Army officer. I joined my right hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh and Wickford on the delegation to Ukraine, which was put to

defence
413
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman makes a helpful challenge. Clearly, there is no impact assessment with the amendment. However, there is a joint service publication, the RARO—regular army reserve of officers—list, and there are those letters I receive annually asking me to update my address and contact details. There are already mec

defence
97
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak in support of the amendment, which was tabled in the name of His Majesty’s loyal Opposition, and to set out my broader support for clause 20. I will begin with the clause itself, because it addresses the composition of the court martial. In such circumstances, it is right that

defence
249
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I welcome the hon. Member’s intervention. If he is suggesting that we should look at going wider than the confines of this specific amendment, I would welcome that conversation. It is about increasing the flexibility and agility of the court martial system so that it reflects the challenges for those who currently serv

defence
55
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I welcome the clause. Will the Minister set out how there will be consistency in the use of these powers by commanding officers, to ensure that there is equality of justice across the board?

defence
34
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend, who from his time as a Defence Minister knows well how to keep tabs on those who have served our country but are now retired. The pension scheme is an obvious way to do so. In addition, he makes an important point about the willingness of individuals to engage in the process. Thes

defence
601
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will confine my remarks to amendment 6, tabled by the hon. Members for North Devon and for Tunbridge Wells. Although I have real sympathy with its purpose, I am hesitant about its drafting, and recognise that, in this place, we sometimes develop what could be described as an unhealthy instinct to overcomplicate what,

defence
1,096
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

On the basis of the Minister’s clarification and reassurances, I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clauses 25 and 26 ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 27 Driving disqualification orders: reduced disqualification period Question proposed, That the clause stand part of th

defence
51
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship this afternoon, Mr Efford. I will speak in support of amendments 18 and 19 and, in doing so, will address clause 25 more broadly. At its heart, clause 25 concerns one of the most sensitive and important decisions in the entire service justice framework—the point at whic

defence
261
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. I am grateful for the opportunity to speak in support of new clause 12 and offer broader support for clauses 5 to 9, which represent a significant strengthening of the protective framework in the service justice system. It is worth setting out the basic prin

defence
1,012
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 18, in clause 25, page 43, line 23, leave out paragraph (a) and insert— “(a) must require that, before a victim is asked to express a preference regarding jurisdiction— (i) the victim is provided with a standardised explanation of the service justice system and the civilian justice system, (ii)

defence
186
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I fear that recollections may differ. My interpretation of the evidence that we heard is not that this is a failing system—far from it. I gently suggest to the hon. Member that the civilian Crown courts and magistrates courts may not be the best benchmark against which to compare its performance. There is a wider issue

defence
922
← PreviousPage 3 of 19 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.