The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 333 contributions

Speeches by Shastri-Hurst.

Every Hansard contribution by Neil Shastri-Hurst this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 333 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 17Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. Before I start, I should probably put it on record that I am on the RARO—Regular Army Reserve of Officers—list as a former Regular Army officer. I joined my right hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh and Wickford on the delegation to Ukraine, which was put to

defence
413
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I welcome the hon. Member’s intervention. If he is suggesting that we should look at going wider than the confines of this specific amendment, I would welcome that conversation. It is about increasing the flexibility and agility of the court martial system so that it reflects the challenges for those who currently serv

defence
55
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman makes a helpful challenge. Clearly, there is no impact assessment with the amendment. However, there is a joint service publication, the RARO—regular army reserve of officers—list, and there are those letters I receive annually asking me to update my address and contact details. There are already mec

defence
97
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister is right to challenge me on the case that I am making. It is about competing challenges facing those in senior rank in the armed forces. My right hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh and Wickford gave the example of colonels or above. We have heard of very senior officers being brought before a court martia

defence
395
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. I am grateful for the opportunity to speak in support of new clause 12 and offer broader support for clauses 5 to 9, which represent a significant strengthening of the protective framework in the service justice system. It is worth setting out the basic prin

defence
1,012
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend, who from his time as a Defence Minister knows well how to keep tabs on those who have served our country but are now retired. The pension scheme is an obvious way to do so. In addition, he makes an important point about the willingness of individuals to engage in the process. Thes

defence
601
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak in support of the amendment, which was tabled in the name of His Majesty’s loyal Opposition, and to set out my broader support for clause 20. I will begin with the clause itself, because it addresses the composition of the court martial. In such circumstances, it is right that

defence
249
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 18, in clause 25, page 43, line 23, leave out paragraph (a) and insert— “(a) must require that, before a victim is asked to express a preference regarding jurisdiction— (i) the victim is provided with a standardised explanation of the service justice system and the civilian justice system, (ii)

defence
186
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I welcome the clause. Will the Minister set out how there will be consistency in the use of these powers by commanding officers, to ensure that there is equality of justice across the board?

defence
34
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

On the basis of the Minister’s clarification and reassurances, I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clauses 25 and 26 ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 27 Driving disqualification orders: reduced disqualification period Question proposed, That the clause stand part of th

defence
51
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will confine my remarks to amendment 6, tabled by the hon. Members for North Devon and for Tunbridge Wells. Although I have real sympathy with its purpose, I am hesitant about its drafting, and recognise that, in this place, we sometimes develop what could be described as an unhealthy instinct to overcomplicate what,

defence
1,096
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I fear that recollections may differ. My interpretation of the evidence that we heard is not that this is a failing system—far from it. I gently suggest to the hon. Member that the civilian Crown courts and magistrates courts may not be the best benchmark against which to compare its performance. There is a wider issue

defence
922
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship this afternoon, Mr Efford. I will speak in support of amendments 18 and 19 and, in doing so, will address clause 25 more broadly. At its heart, clause 25 concerns one of the most sensitive and important decisions in the entire service justice framework—the point at whic

defence
261
13 Apr 2026SEND Provision and Reform

I am grateful to my constituency neighbour for giving way. I was in the same meeting, and one of the big concerns was the loss of the special school planned for Tamworth Lane. Does my hon. Friend agree that that not only detracts from parents and pupils who would benefit, but puts additional pressures on mainstream sch

educationsocial-carelocal-government
57
13 Apr 2026Middle East

The Prime Minister is absolutely correct to praise the service of our armed forces personnel, and I join him in doing so, but they are being let down by the failure to deliver the defence investment plan. That failure can only be the result of either inertia or incompetence within the Government. Which one is it?

defenceenergycost-of-living
56
25 Mar 2026Engagements

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On 21 November last year, Robert Clancy, a hugely valued and much loved member of my staff, took his own life. He was 29. While successive Governments have done a great deal to deal with the scourge of suicide in this country, there is much more that can be done. Will the Prime Minister personal

energycost-of-livinglocal-government
82
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

I promise the Minister that this will be the last time I intervene.

defencehealtheducation
13
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

Does the Minister not accept that there is inconsistent application of the covenant across public bodies, and that to try to fix that, which all of us on the Committee are seeking to do, there is strength in codifying it in the Bill?

defencehealtheducation
43
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

I am grateful to the hon. and gallant Member for his intervention. This is about placing a clear, time-bound duty on the Secretary of State to secure continuity of secondary care for dependants within six months. We want their clinical need to transfer horizontally across, as opposed to vertically downwards. That is th

defencehealtheducation
825
24 Mar 2026Armed Forces Bill (First sitting)

It continues to be a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. I will confine my remarks to amendment 10, concerning the continuity of NHS secondary care services for the dependants of members of the armed forces. The amendment addresses an issue that has very real consequences for the health and wellbeing

defencehealtheducation
515
← PreviousPage 2 of 17 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.