The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 575 contributions

Speeches by Irons.

Every Hansard contribution by Natasha Irons this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 101120 of 575 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 6 of 29Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

Does that cost the BBC more money to use?

9
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

So at least for Meta, the platforms are not safe for children aged 13 and above, as opposed to TikTok, which is trying to make it safe for children of 13 and up.

33
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

Just so you are aware, your content is on the non-logged-in bit as well. If you go on to just the website, which is next to the slop and next to whatever else it may be, it is also there. The point that we are trying to make, I feel, is that broadcasters are jumping through hoops and doing the right thing when it comes

92
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

Your content isn’t, but the platform that you put it on has been found to be so. Your walled garden of Sky Kids on Sky—your Sky platforms—I am sure has been created to the highest possible standards, but whether you are using it as a marketing tool or not, the content is on a platform that has been found to be intentio

79
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

How do we help, basically?

5
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

Are your platforms safe for children aged 13 and above?

10
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

On YouTube.

2
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

What about a crazy AI video of something that did not happen but is not necessarily a news report? Who is checking that?

23
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

Who determines what is misinformation on your platform?

8
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

I broadened that out to include other content creators who are making higher-quality content. If you have content creators on your platform who you deem to be making higher-quality content, as Instagram does, are you promoting them—or will you in the future—above other stuff that perhaps is not as high-quality or is no

59
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

I am an MP in Croydon, and the red versus blue trend had a significant impact on some local schools. One school had a lot of children in one year who did not turn up because they were so afraid of what was going to happen. I appreciate that this is about content on your platform. You are very clear that you do not want

223
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

Definitely, the commentary on it was left on your platform for quite some time. The initial posts were taken down but the thing that you said creates the hype—people talking about the thing—that stuff was left up for quite some time. I want to pick up on one thing very quickly. You talked about the accounts that posted

89
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

That is the point, isn’t it? Again, this is about young people’s content, where they find it and where they migrate to consume it. We can all accept that there are benefits to that and that groups can form, but we are talking about how we keep them safe and prevent the harms. I couldn’t really get to this point: are yo

74
14 Apr 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1338)

Who am I to tell you how to do anything in your business, but surely part of the negotiation with a teenager to have an account could be, “You need to have this linked to a parent.” Thirty-five might be a bit too high, but surely you can do things to ensure that it is not basically like sticking seatbelts in your car a

83
24 Mar 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1339)

What are the top three lessons that the UK Government can take from that when we are looking at legacy, when we are looking at not just having an event, but what it can do for communities afterwards or, as you said, in the lead up to those things?

49
24 Mar 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1339)

There was a discussion earlier about trying not to have a strategy that is UK-wide that interrupts what you are doing and what Wales is doing, and they are clearly successful in their own right and any strategy should not undo what is working. However, if we have a clear measure and we are all looking at the same thing

83
24 Mar 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1339)

Does it inform decision-making and planning programmes?

7
24 Mar 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1339)

Are you able to look at the community legacy of events?

11
24 Mar 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1339)

I want to talk about the eventsIMPACT toolkit. Can you explain what the benefits are of using that?

18
24 Mar 2026Culture, Media and Sport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1339)

We have had evidence that the UK Government do not use the same model. They do not use eventsIMPACT as much as Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Do you think that they are missing a trick there?

37
← PreviousPage 6 of 29 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.