The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,934 contributions

Speeches by Pennycook.

Every Hansard contribution by Matthew Pennycook this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 761780 of 1,934 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 39 of 97Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

I will take your question in two parts. It is worth saying that the impact assessment is a proportionate assessment of the impacts of part 3 and other parts of the Bill from readily available data. There is limited data in this area, but although we would love to have more, there is enough. Nutrient neutrality is used

328
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

I would only emphasise what I have already said. The section 19 declaration is there on the front of the Bill. It is not routine for the Government to publish EPPSs. I had this in my own Select Committee the other day. I am always asked to be far more transparent than every previous Government, and just publish all our

87
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

They are set out clearly in the Bill. You will have noted the very specific amendment on the overall improvement test that we made in the package released last week to insert the word “materially”, so the conservation measures must be materially significant. The overall improvement test is a test that the Secretary of

240
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

I cannot comment on advice that I have not seen.

10
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

It is for the Government to make the statement that they feel it is compliant.

15
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

The NPPF contains a number of things in terms of climate policy, climate mitigation and adaptation. The embodied carbon intensity of building materials comes from the whole supply chain. I know the Committee will understand that the action is therefore Government-wide in that respect to decarbonise supply chains and cr

210
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

As I have said, we recognise that embodied carbon can account for a significant proportion of a building’s whole-life carbon emissions, and that managing not only carbon emissions but carbon storage is vital to mitigating the speed and impact of climate change. On the planning side of things, we went out to consultatio

127
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

On future standards, we will obviously consult on those later this year. In terms of embodied carbon, very specifically, as I said, we think the appropriate way forward is to update the relevant PPG. That is not only to assist local authorities in considering carbon emissions within the plan-making process, but to supp

91
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

We will split this up, Chair, if that is amenable to you, perhaps with Minister Creagh taking ecology; I will specifically speak to construction and planning. As I have said from the moment I was appointed, there are a series of very significant constraints, or challenges, that we need to overcome in significantly boos

382
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

There is a specific DEFRA funding commitment, which I will let Minister Creagh speak to, and it is incredibly welcome from our point of view. The measures that I would highlight most in allowing local authorities to fill those skills gaps are the measures in the Planning and Infrastructure Bill that allow local authori

96
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

I think you are referring to the challenge—and it is a challenge—of the absorption rate that we are partly constrained by. I have never been shy about saying that we are over-reliant on a speculative development model that constrains housing supply and drives sub-optimal outcomes—I am very clear on that point. We want

201
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

And the package of amendments that we have tabled, as I said, substantially allays their concerns.

16
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

We laboured over extensive debates in Committee, Chair, so in the interest of time, I just refer the Committee to those. Ms Chowns, you are well aware that the Bill is premised on Natural England having a degree of flexibility in how it applies the mitigation hierarchy. We would expect it to do so normally, but if it f

110
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

We accept that in some respects there will be impacts. In the round is the important point, because again—I emphasise—we are moving to a strategic approach, which needs to deliver overall environmental improvements across a wider area, not on a site-by-site specific basis. That is how we get the win-win. I appreciate t

75
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

I can happily read you the quote, Ms Chowns: “even after the material amendments the Government proposes, the Bill would, in some respects, lower environmental protection on the face of the law. In the round, however, the additional safeguards proposed today make Government’s intended ‘win-win’ for nature and the econo

54
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

Again, I would not necessarily agree with your characterisation of what I said.

13
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

As I said—to re-emphasise my previous point—it is for Natural England to make a judgment, across the EDP area, on the basis of scientific evidence. I refer to some of the amendments that I have already spoken about.

38
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

I am more than happy to. There is the £14 million it has been allocated to start things up and the fact that the scheme runs on a cost recovery basis as it begins to get up and running. We can go into all of the resourcing questions, but at the heart of who we are asking to make these judgments about what the appropria

111
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

The negative effect in what respect?

6
21 Jul 2025Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 439)

The requirement is that Natural England brings forward environmental delivery plans that will meet the overall improvement test. My assertion is that they would not put that in front of the Secretary of State if they were not confident that it would do so.

44
← PreviousPage 39 of 97 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.