The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 864 contributions

Speeches by Mayhew.

Every Hansard contribution by Jerome Mayhew this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 864 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 44Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is just as pleasurable to have you in the Chair today as it was last week, Sir Alec. I remind hon. Members that clause 7 gives the Secretary of State the power to issue and publish directions to Great British Railways relating to its railway activities. It also outlines how the Secretary of State must obtain consent

transport
800
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 120, in schedule 2, page 60, line 36, leave out “may” and insert “must”. This amendment would require the statement of objectives to contain standards to be achieved when carrying on activities in relation to railways and railway services.

transportfiscal-policy
44
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I agreed with the hon. Gentleman until that last sentence, because new clause 40, which I will come to in a moment, would require not the removal of subsidy but looking towards it—it is aspirational. It would set GBR’s sights on minimising its costs to the taxpayer, not through penny pinching if that would be the wrong

transportfiscal-policy
537
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will deal briefly with amendment 143 and develop some arguments on the other amendments. I congratulate the hon. Member for Didcot and Wantage on tabling amendment 143, which pushes in exactly the same direction that I have been pushing today, and also last Thursday, in developing the concern about increasing microma

transport
750
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 119, in schedule 2, page 60, line 2, at end insert— “(1A) The date specified in section 1(d) must be at least 24 months before the start of the funding period.” This amendment would ensure the Secretary of State has to notify the ORR and GBR of the amount of financial assistance for the next fun

transportfiscal-policy
74
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I heard what the Minister said, but it flies in the face of the evidence that the industry itself gives him and all of us about the need for certainty towards the end of a control period. All that the amendment seeks is certainty for two years at the start of a control period. How is he going to address that particular

transportfiscal-policy
63
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

Where is the reference to persistent, urgent and unforeseen incidents in the Bill?

transport
13
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Mr Western, you get what you measure. We on this side of the Committee are very keen that we measure the level of involvement for the taxpayer and that we do our best to look after the taxpayer in the design of this structure, so I intend to press all the amendments.

transportfiscal-policy
52
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

My hon. Friend is entirely right. That will be a theme of our comments on and challenges to the Bill throughout the progress of our scrutiny: accountability without responsibility is no accountability at all. Time and again, we see an unwillingness from those who drafted the Bill to trust the role of parliamentarians a

transport
270
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Thank you, Mr Western, and for agreeing to be in the Chair this afternoon. We are part-way through consideration of the schedule, with a degree of overlap: amendment 109 was selected in a separate group to this one, although its wording is intricately linked to that of amendments 110 to 116. I shall try to minimise the

transportfiscal-policy
734
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is certainly welcome, but we are still in the position in which an improvement to a line—something as small as the Haughley junction improvement, which costs roughly £15 million to £20 million—still needs ministerial sign-off from the Treasury before it can be authorised. The Government have some way to go to improv

transport
422
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am grateful for Minister’s explanation, but I am not persuaded by it and seek to put amendment 109 to a vote. Question put, That the amendment be made.

transport
29
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I echo all the comments made by my right hon. and hon. Friends. I also thank the Minister for facing up to it with a point of order. It was obvious last week that a point of order was on its way. None of us on the Opposition Benches will hold him to his initial, rather quick, response—no doubt I will do something simil

transport
328
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 109, in schedule 1, page 55, line 10, leave out from “may,” to “grant” and insert— “at the recommendation of the Office of the Rail and Road in relation to matters related to safety and standards and, after consultation with the Passengers’ Council,”. This amendment would require the Secretary o

transport
1,149
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 12, in clause 7, page 4, line 30, after “functions” insert— “where the Office for Rail and Road, in carrying out its functions under section 69A of the Railways Act 1993 (as inserted by section 74 of this Act), has deemed Great British Railways to be in breach of its statutory functions.” This a

transport
93
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

You are kind to call me to speak again, Sir Alec; I realise that I did not speak to clause 10 earlier. Briefly, I recognise that clause 10 mirrors clause 9, which we have debated substantially, but it is important to note that Scottish Ministers are given a guidance function, whereas Welsh Ministers are not. That refle

transport
138
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

We have debated these two clauses. We have made clear our concerns about the current drafting and have tried our best to improve the Bill through a number of very sensible amendments, the majority of which were supported by the Liberal Democrats. We in our turn have supported some sensible amendments proposed by the ho

transport
136
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I completely agree with my hon. Friend. When one’s children come and ask for something, the wise answer is always to ask first, “What did your mother say?” If we were able to apply that common sense to this situation, I would not be so concerned. What we have instead is stakeholder management culture seeping into the c

transport
62
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

As I have set out in my series of amendments, the appropriate oversight and control is to remove the chief executive. The Minister must accept that, if the Secretary of State thinks that the organisation is going in the wrong direction, is not listening to guidance or has gone rogue in some way, they have the unfettere

transport
114
22 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fourth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 7, in clause 6, page 4, line 15, after “with” insert “Secretary of State and”. This amendment maintains the Secretary of State’s statutory co-operation duty with Transport for London to keep the position in line with other mayoralties.

transportenvironmenteconomy-jobs
43
← PreviousPage 13 of 44 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.