The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 864 contributions

Speeches by Mayhew.

Every Hansard contribution by Jerome Mayhew this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 221240 of 864 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 12 of 44Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. We have made that point as forcefully as we can. I trust the Minister when he says that he will take it away and do his best with his ministerial and departmental colleagues, but it is not just a matter of saying, “We kind of understand that licences already exist. Licences have been

transport
790
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

From the Government’s perspective, yes, it would be, but we have recent experience—this is a slight tangent, but I hope the Committee will bear with me—of Governments passing key objectives to achieve long out in the distance. I am thinking of the Climate Change Act 2008 and its objective of achieving net zero by 2050.

transportfiscal-policy
546
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Yes, repeatedly, which is great, because my hon. Friend is absolutely fighting for his constituency and his constituents. He has told me of a repeated trouble that communities experience when a level crossing closes very frequently and for long periods with no regard to the economic impact of that on the town in which

transportfiscal-policy
497
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

The Minister is a mind reader; I was just about to ask him to give way. He says he cannot agree to amendment 124 because we need flexibility in the future, but he will see that it refers to “measurable performance indicators for each statutory duty listed in Section 18”, so that flexibility would only run so far as any

transportfiscal-policy
98
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

GBR may plan on a five year basis, but it is not the same five years, is it?

transportfiscal-policy
18
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 109, in schedule 1, page 55, line 10, leave out from “may,” to “grant” and insert— “at the recommendation of the Office of the Rail and Road in relation to matters related to safety and standards and, after consultation with the Passengers’ Council,”. This amendment would require the Secretary o

transport
1,149
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I echo all the comments made by my right hon. and hon. Friends. I also thank the Minister for facing up to it with a point of order. It was obvious last week that a point of order was on its way. None of us on the Opposition Benches will hold him to his initial, rather quick, response—no doubt I will do something simil

transport
328
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I agreed with the hon. Gentleman until that last sentence, because new clause 40, which I will come to in a moment, would require not the removal of subsidy but looking towards it—it is aspirational. It would set GBR’s sights on minimising its costs to the taxpayer, not through penny pinching if that would be the wrong

transportfiscal-policy
537
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I am grateful for that clarification, but although the Minister may share that ambition, he is not choosing to do anything about it. Having said that, I said I was not going to press the amendments to a vote and I will not. I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

transportfiscal-policy
56
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Clause 15 requires the Secretary of State to publish a document that sets out the long-term strategy for the railway, which we welcome, after consulting with Welsh Ministers and the passenger watchdog. The Secretary of State must keep the strategy under review and publish any revisions. The clause does not provide any

transportfiscal-policy
665
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is certainly welcome, but we are still in the position in which an improvement to a line—something as small as the Haughley junction improvement, which costs roughly £15 million to £20 million—still needs ministerial sign-off from the Treasury before it can be authorised. The Government have some way to go to improv

transport
422
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 119, in schedule 2, page 60, line 2, at end insert— “(1A) The date specified in section 1(d) must be at least 24 months before the start of the funding period.” This amendment would ensure the Secretary of State has to notify the ORR and GBR of the amount of financial assistance for the next fun

transportfiscal-policy
74
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 233, in schedule 1, page 55, line 10, leave out “consultation” and insert “agreement”. This amendment limits the Secretary of State’s powers to set GBR’s licence unilaterally.

transportfiscal-policy
32
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

This afternoon is turning into a marathon session, and the only people who cannot take a comfort break are the shadow Minister and the Minister, so far as I can work out; I have my legs crossed. Clause 13 allows GBR to charge people to whom it is providing a service relating to its functions—this is the important bit—“

transportfiscal-policy
409
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Mr Western, you get what you measure. We on this side of the Committee are very keen that we measure the level of involvement for the taxpayer and that we do our best to look after the taxpayer in the design of this structure, so I intend to press all the amendments.

transportfiscal-policy
52
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

Thank you, Mr Western, for allowing me a second bite at the cherry. I misdirected myself in dealing just with clause 12 in itself, rather than the new clauses in the group. A forward view of funding certainty is key to stopping the stop-start approach to infrastructure funding. The Committee has received plenty of evid

transportfiscal-policy
942
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am grateful for Minister’s explanation, but I am not persuaded by it and seek to put amendment 109 to a vote. Question put, That the amendment be made.

transport
29
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 124, in schedule 2, page 62, line 9, at end insert— “(d) measurable performance indicators for each statutory duty listed in Section 18.” This amendment would require the business plan to include measurable performance indicators for GBR’s duties.

transportfiscal-policy
43
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Fifth sitting)

We have debated these two clauses. We have made clear our concerns about the current drafting and have tried our best to improve the Bill through a number of very sensible amendments, the majority of which were supported by the Liberal Democrats. We in our turn have supported some sensible amendments proposed by the ho

transport
136
27 Jan 2026Railways Bill (Sixth sitting)

The Minister wants flexibility, and he says that is why amendments 123 and 206—tabled by myself and the hon. Member for Didcot and Wantage respectively—should not be agreed to. Will the Minister set out the circumstances in which he thinks it would not be appropriate for the organisation to focus on “delivering improve

transportfiscal-policy
71
← PreviousPage 12 of 44 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.