The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 357 contributions

Speeches by Reed.

Every Hansard contribution by David Reed this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 4160 of 357 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 3 of 18Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

There is a major inconsistency in this new line of attack. I do not want to fall into the blame game, because we need to look forward and be in a position where we can protect ourselves and our country, but we are essentially now blaming officials. [Interruption.]

defencetechnologylabour-market
48
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

Given that my colleagues have very ably gone through amendments 21 to 24, I will just comment on amendment 20 before handing over to the Minister. Amendment 20 would increase the maximum age for service in the reserve forces from 65 to 67, which is important in bringing the reserves in line with the age of retirement,

defence
416
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

We are now blaming officials. If the original deadline for the DIP was October, and now the argument is that the delay is because so many problems have been identified, were the Ministers’ officials telling them inaccuracies about when it could be published?

defencetechnologylabour-market
43
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I rise to support new clause 16, tabled by my right hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh and Wickford. In the last 10 years working in the defence space—in the civil service, with industry, handing out defence contracts, running a small or medium-sized enterprise that worked with defence, and working for a defence prime

defencetechnologylabour-market
455
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Efford. I raised a point about clearances when we first started discussing the Bill, and that is one of the sticking points we need to get right. If people have secured security clearances—enhanced developed vetting—in the military, but then go into an organisation tha

defence
144
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The hon. Member has a Royal Marines base and a large veteran community in his constituency. This has been an issue, and I want it to be quashed as quickly as possible. If Ministers in the Department for Transport have not been able to confirm it, I really hope that the Minister in this Committee can stand up and say th

defencetechnologylabour-market
246
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

defencetechnologylabour-market
12
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I declare an interest: I am also a proud holder of a veterans railcard, as are many of my constituents. The new clause is modest in scope. It does not create new schemes. Both HM forces railcards and the veterans railcard are already in place. The purpose of the new clause is simply to give a clear statutory basis to e

defencetechnologylabour-market
190
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The fact that other countries that we consider to be close allies are also considering this is an important point that I will come on to. In the aftermath of 9/11, the Government chose to derogate from article 5 of the European convention on human rights through part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act. Tha

defencetechnologylabour-market
722
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The Minister has a great deal of experience in this space, and defence is working hard to unblock some of these issues. The point I raised in my speech was that it is almost impossible to work through the split responsibilities across so many different Departments and regulatory bodies. As we have had regulations built

defencetechnologylabour-market
89
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

New clause 9 would provide a clear framework for an authorised person to approve the use of drones for routine testing, evaluation, training and capability development. The Committee has already considered the counter-drone provisions in the Bill, and we have had a good debate on that. The powers to detect, deter and,

defencetechnologylabour-market
2,273
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Thank you, Mr Efford; I appreciate that. I think new clause 3 is very sensible. I know from personal experience that life in the military is fast. A person may deploy somewhere and get a number of different inoculations, and they do not necessarily think about what they were getting before being deployed. When people c

defencetechnologylabour-market
199
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will expand on clause 30. I pay tribute to my near-ish neighbour in Cornwall, the hon. Member for Truro and Falmouth, for her work on the issue and how she has progressed it in the House of Commons. I think that clause 30, which will extend the remit of the Armed Forces Commissioner to include the Royal Fleet Auxilia

defence
658
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will just pick up on a point I raised this morning, which I discussed with an hon. Friend who has experience in this space. Take, for example, a crime that is committed while a person is serving that is not serious enough to warrant their being remanded into custody—it goes over the six months because it is a knotty

defence
128
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clauses 28 and 29 are practical and proportionate reforms. Clause 28 defines rehabilitation periods for certain service punishments under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. Sanctions such as reduction in rank, forfeiture of seniority and service supervision and punishment orders will no longer be treated as spen

defence
140
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

We want to strengthen the Bill by working with the Government and taking a collaborative approach. Having a shared reality, in any aspect of life, is massively important. Among Opposition Members, there is alignment on the shared reality that we heard about, when we went down to Portsmouth, from the people we empower t

defence
87
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

Clause 27 aligns the service justice system with the civilian courts and introduces a constructive way for offenders to reduce their disqualification period through completion of an approved course. On our side of the Committee we see that as a practical and proportionate reform that supports rehabilitation, encourages

defence
64
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

It continues to be a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Efford. Clauses 21 to 24 cover powers to impose post-charge conditions on persons not in service detention. We welcome these clauses as sensible, technical enforcement improvements to the service justice system. They address a number of anomalies and gaps,

defence
129
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will add to the arguments of my hon. Friend the Member for Solihull West and Shirley, my right hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh and Wickford and the hon. Member for North Devon. The Opposition’s recollections align very closely with those of our Liberal Democrat colleague. Although we did not hear about a system t

defence
162
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

Clause 10 is a necessary and proportionate step to ensure that victims of service offences are properly recognised and supported within the military justice system. Those affected by such offences often face distinct pressures linked to service life, including close living and working environments and concerns about re

defence
178
← PreviousPage 3 of 18 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.