The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 334 contributions

Speeches by Reed.

Every Hansard contribution by David Reed this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 334 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 17Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

To back up the shadow Minister’s point, I was an air cadet for a number of years—[Interruption.] I know he is laughing at that, but in my experience, it was not about recruitment or a pathway into the armed forces. It was really powerful to have, as a youngster, the opportunity to do adventure training, shooting and fl

defence
102
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

Thank you, Mr Efford; I appreciate that. I think new clause 3 is very sensible. I know from personal experience that life in the military is fast. A person may deploy somewhere and get a number of different inoculations, and they do not necessarily think about what they were getting before being deployed. When people c

defencetechnologylabour-market
199
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

Given that my colleagues have very ably gone through amendments 21 to 24, I will just comment on amendment 20 before handing over to the Minister. Amendment 20 would increase the maximum age for service in the reserve forces from 65 to 67, which is important in bringing the reserves in line with the age of retirement,

defence
416
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

defencetechnologylabour-market
12
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

I will speak in support of new clauses 13 and 15. My right hon. Friend has laid out quite a scary case study of what happens when international legal frameworks are used to affect our service personnel. New clause 13 deserves support because it reflects a clear and honest understanding of the legal position. While our

defencetechnologylabour-market
307
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

There is a major inconsistency in this new line of attack. I do not want to fall into the blame game, because we need to look forward and be in a position where we can protect ourselves and our country, but we are essentially now blaming officials. [Interruption.]

defencetechnologylabour-market
48
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

The hon. Member has a Royal Marines base and a large veteran community in his constituency. This has been an issue, and I want it to be quashed as quickly as possible. If Ministers in the Department for Transport have not been able to confirm it, I really hope that the Minister in this Committee can stand up and say th

defencetechnologylabour-market
246
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Sixth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Efford. I raised a point about clearances when we first started discussing the Bill, and that is one of the sticking points we need to get right. If people have secured security clearances—enhanced developed vetting—in the military, but then go into an organisation tha

defence
144
16 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Seventh sitting)

We are now blaming officials. If the original deadline for the DIP was October, and now the argument is that the delay is because so many problems have been identified, were the Ministers’ officials telling them inaccuracies about when it could be published?

defencetechnologylabour-market
43
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

My hon. Friend has again laid out the argument in an extremely comprehensive way, and it will be difficult to add anything new to the argument that he has put forward, but I will give it a go. Ensuring that a victim is properly informed before being asked to state a preference on whether their case is heard in the serv

defence
370
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

We welcome clauses 18 and 19 on summary hearings and deprivation orders with the punishments available to commanding officers. They represent a serious aim and a proportionate update to the summary hearing powers available to commanding officers. Clause 18 would promote greater consistency across the services, by enabl

defence
165
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

It continues to be a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Efford. Clauses 21 to 24 cover powers to impose post-charge conditions on persons not in service detention. We welcome these clauses as sensible, technical enforcement improvements to the service justice system. They address a number of anomalies and gaps,

defence
129
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I welcome the clause, which seems a sensible and practical strengthening of the duty of commanding officers to report serious offences. The Minister, as a former commanding officer, will have experienced this duty at first hand, so I respect his judgment and expertise on the matter. It is right that responsibility shou

defence
167
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will make that intervention now, and then we can carry on that conversation. If there is zero tolerance of drugs, and if the person who has committed a crime knows they will be kicked out—as they should be—it would be good to hear from the Ministry of Defence if there is a loophole in which someone could say, “I will

defence
111
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

We want to strengthen the Bill by working with the Government and taking a collaborative approach. Having a shared reality, in any aspect of life, is massively important. Among Opposition Members, there is alignment on the shared reality that we heard about, when we went down to Portsmouth, from the people we empower t

defence
87
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will add to the arguments of my hon. Friend the Member for Solihull West and Shirley, my right hon. Friend the Member for Rayleigh and Wickford and the hon. Member for North Devon. The Opposition’s recollections align very closely with those of our Liberal Democrat colleague. Although we did not hear about a system t

defence
162
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

These clauses deal with entry for purposes of obtaining evidence, arrest and detention by civil authorities, pre-charge custody, and time limits for charging certain offences. It is right that service police are given clear and effective powers to obtain evidence, as the Minister has laid out clearly, and that such pow

defence
127
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

We have talked a lot about the UK, but can the Minister give some clarity on when those offences happen abroad? Say, for instance, someone was on an overseas base in Cyprus, and the Cypriot police were to be involved. What would happen at that point and how would that affect the equation?

defence
53
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fourth sitting)

Yes, I completely agree. If a crime has happened and the victim engages with a support unit, having to move between civilian and military judicial systems, and switch between people that they have had trusted conversations with, is—if I were to put myself in their shoes—probably not what they want to do if they have be

defence
118
14 Apr 2026Armed Forces Bill (Fifth sitting)

I will just pick up on a point I raised this morning, which I discussed with an hon. Friend who has experience in this space. Take, for example, a crime that is committed while a person is serving that is not serious enough to warrant their being remanded into custody—it goes over the six months because it is a knotty

defence
128
← PreviousPage 2 of 17 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.