The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 351 contributions

Speeches by Burghart.

Every Hansard contribution by Alex Burghart this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 351 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 18Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

I do not recall us saying that it was a terrible idea. I distinctly remember many Conservative peers speaking in favour of it actually, but that is part of the joy of the independence of the upper House, which, as I will shortly explain, risks being undermined by this legislation. What the Government are now trying to

other
356
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

The hon. Gentleman will understand that this legislation is not being blocked but improved. That is what Parliament does, and that is how the process of scrutiny works. He will see very clearly that the amendments make significant improvements to the faulty legislation that his party brought forward.

other
48
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

No I haven’t.

other
3
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

Go on—one more time.

other
4
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

The hon. Gentleman makes a good point—there are other types of honour—but we already have peers who have stood down, and they get to keep their titles. They are called Members of the Lords but do not sit in the Lords, so the disjuncture already exists. [Interruption.] Would the Paymaster General mind passing me the wat

other
118
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

Well, I don’t know—he looks like he has made an effort today, and he is looking at me in a particular sort of way. There is a suggestion that everyone is busting a gut to create a new status of peerage when it is unnecessary. Let us put it this way. I think a lot of people in our country recognise that getting a peerag

other
162
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

I am not sure whether his voters would be that impressed by the Ministers in the Commons at the moment, to be honest. The point of principle still stands: if somebody is a Minister of the Crown, it is perfectly reasonable that they should be paid for doing that job. I would be interested to know what the Government’s p

other
119
13 Jul 2025 Privilege

I put on record my gratitude to the Minister for reaching out to me earlier to explain her position; to the Clerk of the Journals for briefing me this afternoon; and to my hon. Friend the Member for North Dorset (Simon Hoare) for talking me through this issue over the weekend. I will be unusually brief, because I wish

mp-performanceother
332
9 Jul 2025Plan for Change

It is no surprise that the Minister could not point to any analysis, because no such analysis exists. That is because the Government have no plan for growth. They do have a plan for tax, and they have a plan for borrowing—much more borrowing. The Office for Budget Responsibility’s excoriating report earlier this week h

economy-jobshealthenergy
94
9 Jul 2025Plan for Change

In their plan for change, the Government pledged to get the country the highest sustained growth in the G7—or back to where the Conservative Government left it. However, it seems that this Government are on course to fail. All respected international analysis—by the OECD, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund

economy-jobshealthenergy
85
9 Jul 2025Topical Questions

Will the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster confirm that civil servants should not engage in public fundraising for political parties?

economy-jobsdefence
21
9 Jul 2025Topical Questions

Well, I will just fill in the House. For those who are not as well informed as the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the simple fact is that senior civil servants should not be engaged in public fundraising from public speaking for political parties. It has been reported that on 23 June, Lord Mandelson, who the Gov

economy-jobsdefence
90
7 Jul 2025Government Resilience Action Plan

I thank the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster for advance sight of his statement and the associated documentation. I also thank him for the date on which the UK emergency alert will be tested—he can only have chosen it to notify the country that it is my birthday. I shall very much look forward to the alarm at 3 pm.

defenceenvironmenttechnology
697
1 Jul 2025Spending Review: Northern Ireland Executive

The spending review settlement for the Northern Ireland Office explicitly covers the Finucane inquiry, but so far the Government have refused to say how much money has been set aside for that inquiry. Will the Secretary of State please tell the House how much do the Government expect the inquiry to cost?

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobshealth
52
1 Jul 2025Spending Review: Northern Ireland Executive

The Government have just had a spending review, so they must know how much they intend to spend. There will be a line in the Treasury accounts set aside for the Finucane inquiry. I do not understand why the Secretary of State finds it so hard to tell the House how much we expect to spend. Similarly, the Government must

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobshealth
144
19 Jun 2025 Green-belt Development: Rayleigh and Wickford

indicated assent.

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
2
8 Jun 2025Draft Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007 (Extension of Duration of Non-jury Trial Provisions) Order 2025

It is an honour to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Twigg. The Conservative party remains wholeheartedly committed to trial by jury, a right that was first recorded in our laws in 997, but is thought to be even more ancient. The jury system obviously has a central place in how we run our justice system. It brings the

crimedefence
350
8 Jun 2025Draft Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007 (Extension of Duration of Non-jury Trial Provisions) Order 2025

By when does the Minister hope to see that independent expert appointed—by the summer, the autumn or the end of the year? Can she give us a sense of how long the process will take?

crimedefence
35
4 Jun 2025Cyber-security

The Government’s own cyber experts Innovate UK have warned the Government that the proposed Chinese embassy at the Royal Mint threatens to compromise the telephone and internet exchange that serves the financial City of London. The experts are now telling the Government what everyone else has known all along: the super

defencetechnologyeconomy-jobs
125
4 Jun 2025Cyber-security

The previous Government did not engage—sorry, they did not disengage. At the heart of this are two simple facts. First, the Government already know that this site is a security risk. It is a security risk to the City of London and, through it, our economy and the economies of all nations that trade in London. Secondly,

defencetechnologyeconomy-jobs
83
← PreviousPage 13 of 18 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.