The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 337 contributions

Speeches by Burghart.

Every Hansard contribution by Alex Burghart this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 221240 of 337 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 12 of 17Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

I am interested in my hon. Friend’s excellent point, and I hope the Minister will respond to that in his closing remarks. What we will see is the removal of a group of public servants to make way for Labour placemen and Labour stooges—a huge act of patronage. I do not think anybody here believes that will improve scrut

other
404
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

I do not recall us saying that it was a terrible idea. I distinctly remember many Conservative peers speaking in favour of it actually, but that is part of the joy of the independence of the upper House, which, as I will shortly explain, risks being undermined by this legislation. What the Government are now trying to

other
356
3 Sept 2025 Privilege

It is an honour to follow my hon. Friend the Member for North Dorset (Simon Hoare), the Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, and I thank him for being so generous in leaving so much time for others to speak. We absolutely support the motion that he has brought before the House. We ar

mp-performanceother
167
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

I am grateful to the Paymaster General for giving way, as I feel that he is drawing to the end of his comments. One thing he has not discussed in his round-up of the debate is ministerial pay. I appreciate the remarks that he made at the start, and that he does not believe this is the right way or place to do that, but

other
98
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

No I haven’t.

other
3
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

It is a pleasure to debate this historic piece of legislation on an historic day; my hon. Friend the Member for Windsor (Jack Rankin) reminds me that it is the 1,100th anniversary of Athelstan being crowned King at Kingston, and I know there are a great many celebrations going on there today. The monarchy lives on—even

other
689
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

I fully accept that the Labour party has changed its mind, but in doing so it has reneged on the deal that it struck in the late ’90s. Let us be clear about what is happening. The Labour Government are now seeking to remove a whole group of public servants who have done nothing wrong—

other
55
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

Sit down. Those public servants are in the Lords because the last Labour Government put them there as part of the deal that it struck on long-term constitutional change.

other
29
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

If the hon. Gentleman believes that the Labour party has a moral obligation to implement every part of its manifesto, how does he feel about the bits that it has already ditched?

other
32
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

The hon. Gentleman is making a good speech. Does he think that, given the policy they have embarked on, the Government should have a duty to protect Cross Benchers who have no party representation in this House? The hereditary peers who are Cross Benchers will otherwise go by the wayside. Would he at least support his

other
59
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

We are under no obligation to support Government legislation in the Commons.

other
12
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

This is the Commons—we are not obliged to support you.

other
10
3 Sept 2025 House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill

rose—

other
1
13 Jul 2025 Privilege

I put on record my gratitude to the Minister for reaching out to me earlier to explain her position; to the Clerk of the Journals for briefing me this afternoon; and to my hon. Friend the Member for North Dorset (Simon Hoare) for talking me through this issue over the weekend. I will be unusually brief, because I wish

mp-performanceother
332
9 Jul 2025Plan for Change

It is no surprise that the Minister could not point to any analysis, because no such analysis exists. That is because the Government have no plan for growth. They do have a plan for tax, and they have a plan for borrowing—much more borrowing. The Office for Budget Responsibility’s excoriating report earlier this week h

economy-jobshealthenergy
94
9 Jul 2025Topical Questions

Will the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster confirm that civil servants should not engage in public fundraising for political parties?

economy-jobsdefence
21
9 Jul 2025Topical Questions

Well, I will just fill in the House. For those who are not as well informed as the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the simple fact is that senior civil servants should not be engaged in public fundraising from public speaking for political parties. It has been reported that on 23 June, Lord Mandelson, who the Gov

economy-jobsdefence
90
9 Jul 2025Plan for Change

In their plan for change, the Government pledged to get the country the highest sustained growth in the G7—or back to where the Conservative Government left it. However, it seems that this Government are on course to fail. All respected international analysis—by the OECD, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund

economy-jobshealthenergy
85
7 Jul 2025Government Resilience Action Plan

I thank the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster for advance sight of his statement and the associated documentation. I also thank him for the date on which the UK emergency alert will be tested—he can only have chosen it to notify the country that it is my birthday. I shall very much look forward to the alarm at 3 pm.

defenceenvironmenttechnology
697
1 Jul 2025Spending Review: Northern Ireland Executive

The Government have just had a spending review, so they must know how much they intend to spend. There will be a line in the Treasury accounts set aside for the Finucane inquiry. I do not understand why the Secretary of State finds it so hard to tell the House how much we expect to spend. Similarly, the Government must

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobshealth
144
← PreviousPage 12 of 17 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.