§ 00 Issue8 named divisions2 bills

Border Control

Border security and enforcement

§ 01How parties voted14 parties

Government alignment shows how often each party voted with the government's stated position. Issue-aligned direction shows agreement with the AI-identified supportive stance.

§ 02Bills & votesGrouped by bill
19 Nov 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 37Aye = Support the government rejecting the Lords amendment, trusting the government's asylum policy statement as sufficient without the additional legislative requirement · No = Support retaining the Lords amendment, preferring the additional safeguard to be written into the legislation rather than relying on a policy statement327 · 95Passed12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 18Aye = Support introducing a parliamentary vote to set an annual cap on immigration and asylum seeker numbers, giving Parliament direct control over migration levels · No = Oppose a statutory immigration cap set by Parliament, arguing it is unworkable, legally problematic, and that the government's existing measures are the right approach98 · 318Defeated12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 3Aye = Support stronger removals deterrents and stricter immigration controls, as proposed by the Conservative opposition via New Clause 3 · No = Oppose the Conservative amendment, backing the government's existing approach to border security and asylum in the Bill91 · 320Defeated12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 14Aye = Support repealing or restricting the Human Rights Act to make it easier to deport people, arguing it is misused to block removals · No = Oppose removing Human Rights Act protections, arguing it is a fundamental safeguard and that the Government's own reforms to Article 8 are a more proportionate approach100 · 402Defeated12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: Third ReadingAye = Support passing the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill into law, backing the government's approach to tightening border security and reforming asylum and immigration rules · No = Oppose passing the bill, either because it goes too far on immigration enforcement or does not go far enough, or raises civil liberties concerns315 · 97Passed12 May 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 21Aye = Support creating safe and legal asylum routes for people from countries where none currently exist, reducing reliance on dangerous crossings · No = Oppose this particular mechanism for creating safe routes, either favouring the government's existing approach or rejecting expanded legal migration pathways89 · 400Defeated10 Feb 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: Second ReadingAye = Support the Labour government's approach to tackling illegal immigration through tougher enforcement against criminal gangs and reforming the asylum system · No = Oppose the Bill, either finding it too tough on migrants and asylum seekers, or insufficiently robust compared to previous Conservative approaches335 · 110Passed
How is this calculated?

Government alignment shows how often a party's MPs voted with the government's stated position on this issue. This is the most comparable metric across parties, as it measures the same reference point for everyone.

Issue-aligned direction shows how often MPs voted in the direction tagged as supportive of this issue by AI analysis. For example, if a vote is tagged “pro-environment”, an Aye vote counts as aligned.

Sources
Commons Votes APIcommonsvotes-api.parliament.uk
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0
AI analysisVote stance tagging · Claude 4.x