Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | -50 | 0% on-whip · 232 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | +50 | 100% on-whip · 84 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 58 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | -50 | 0% on-whip · 26 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | 0 | 50% on-whip · 7 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | +50 | 100% on-whip · 4 MPs | |
| Plaid Cymru | Plaid | +50 | 100% on-whip · 4 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Jun 2026 | Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 13 Aye: Support adding New Clause 13 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill · No: Oppose adding New Clause 13, preferring the Bill to proceed without this addition | 78 | 257 | No |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 14 Aye: Support adding New Clause 14 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill · No: Oppose adding New Clause 14 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill | 153 | 256 | No |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: Amendment 3 Aye: Support Amendment 3 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, the substance of which is unknown without debate excerpts · No: Oppose Amendment 3 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, the substance of which is unknown without debate excerpts | 163 | 247 | No |
All 3 divisions on this issue →
By party, the MPs whose voting record on cyber security is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.
LabLabour Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Barry Gardiner | Brent West | 0% |
| Clive Betts | Sheffield South East | 0% |
| John Healey | Rawmarsh and Conisbrough | 0% |
LDLiberal Democrats
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Ed Davey | Kingston and Surbiton | 100% |
| Andrew George | St Ives | 100% |
| Tim Farron | Westmorland and Lonsdale | 100% |
IndLabour and Co-operative Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Gareth Thomas | Harrow West | 0% |
| Chris Evans | Caerphilly | 0% |
| Jonathan Reynolds | Stalybridge and Hyde | 0% |
IndIndependent
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Easton | North Down | 100% |
| Ayoub Khan | Birmingham Perry Barr | 100% |
| Dan Norris | North East Somerset and Hanham | 0% |
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Cyber Security” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.