Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +50 | 100% on-whip · 262 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 90 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | -50 | 0% on-whip · 51 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Ind | +50 | 100% on-whip · 32 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +10 | 60% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | -50 | 0% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Jun 2026 | Draft Agriculture (Delinked Payments) (Reductions) (England) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support accelerating the withdrawal of old-style direct farm subsidies to fund environmental land management schemes that reward sustainable food production and nature recovery · No: Oppose the pace of subsidy withdrawal, arguing farmers face a funding cliff edge before adequate replacement schemes are available, on top of rising costs and other financial pressures | 302 | 153 | Yes |
All 1 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Agricultural Policy” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.