Draft Employment Rights Act 2025 (Investigatory Powers) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026
368
Ayes
—
107
Noes
Passed · Government won
175 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 18 March 2026, the House of Commons approved the Draft Employment Rights Act 2025 (Investigatory Powers) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026 by 368 votes to 107. The result was announced as a deferred division -- meaning MPs had voted on a previous sitting day rather than immediately after a debate. These regulations make technical updates to existing investigatory powers legislation to bring it into line with the Employment Rights Act 2025. **Why it matters:** The regulations ensure that employment enforcement bodies have the legal tools necessary to investigate breaches of the new rights introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025. Without these consequential amendments, there could be gaps between the powers enforcers hold and the obligations the new law places on employers. The Employment Rights Act 2025 introduced a wide range of workplace protections -- including changes to sick pay entitlement and stronger day-one rights -- and these regulations are part of the machinery needed to make those protections enforceable in practice. Media coverage has focused on significant changes taking effect from April 2026, including reformed sick pay rules estimated to benefit around 15 million workers. **The politics:** The vote divided largely along party lines. All 271 Labour MPs voting, along with Labour and Co-operative members and smaller progressive parties including the Liberal Democrats, Greens, and Plaid Cymru, voted in favour. All 91 voting Conservatives, all five DUP members, and all five voting Reform UK MPs voted against. There was one Labour rebel voting No. The opposition's resistance likely reflects broader Conservative and Reform objections to the Employment Rights Act itself rather than specific concerns about investigatory powers procedure, with some retailers and employers groups having raised concerns about the economic impact of the wider legislation on youth employment.
Voting Aye meant
Support transferring investigatory and surveillance powers to the Fair Work Agency as a necessary consequence of merging labour enforcement functions into the new body
Voting No meant
Oppose granting the Fair Work Agency extensive surveillance powers, arguing they are disproportionate for a labour enforcement agency and represent state overreach
475 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 175 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
271
1
90
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
91
25
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
55
0
17
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
30
0
12
Independent
4
4
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
5
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
5
—
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
2
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0