Division · No. 398Monday, 12 January 2026Commons Taxation

Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 12

167
Ayes
350
Noes
Defeated · Government won
128 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 12 January 2026, the House of Commons, sitting as a Committee of the whole House, voted on whether to add New Clause 12 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill. New Clause 12 was tabled by the official Opposition as an amendment to the government's Finance Bill, and would have altered the tax provisions in the legislation. The motion was defeated by 350 votes to 167. **Why it matters:** The Finance (No. 2) Bill legislates for a range of tax changes including increases to dividend income tax rates, increases to savings and property income tax rates, and the continued freezing of income tax thresholds. New Clause 12, along with related amendments tabled by the Conservatives, sought to amend or scrutinise these measures. Its defeat means the government's tax package advances unchanged through committee scrutiny, keeping in place rising dividend tax rates, frozen thresholds, and the new property income tax bands that critics argue increase the burden on savers, pensioners, landlords and small business owners. **The politics:** The vote split almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 341 Labour and Labour-Co-operative Members who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK and the Traditional Unionist Voice all voted in favour. Four Green Party MPs voted with the government. The result reflects the government's comfortable Commons majority, and sits within a broader pattern of the opposition challenging Labour's tax-raising Budget measures, seen also in parallel votes on National Insurance Contributions legislation in March 2026.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to assess whether tax increases on landlords raise rents, implying scepticism about the policy's impact on tenants
Voting No meant
Oppose the review requirement, backing the government's tax changes on property income without mandating an impact assessment on rents
§ 01Who voted how.517 voting members · 128 absent
Aye169No352DID NOT VOTE · 128

517 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 128 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
305
57
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
92
0
24
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
36
6
Independent
2
5
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
Government measures are fair, necessary, and progressive; they raise revenue from those undertaxed relative to employees while protecting public services and maintaining lowest borrowing levels.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (11,197 words)
Gareth DaviesOpposedGrantham and Bourne
Bill represents broken manifesto promises and a 'war on landlords,' savers, and small businesses; threshold freeze and asset income tax hikes total £23 billion and will harm ordinary working people and enterprise culture.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,456 words)
Dr Jeevun SandherSupportiveLoughborough
Dividend tax increase is right because wealth taxation has not kept pace with economic change; comparative evidence from France shows it encourages reinvestment and is easily implementable.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,788 words)
Daisy CooperOpposedSt Albans
Tax changes add unwarranted complexity, burden small businesses, risk unintended rental market consequences, and strain HMRC resources; impact assessments essential before implementation.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,593 words)
Kit MalthouseOpposedNorth West Hampshire
Changes overtax risk and enterprise, destroying incentive culture; dividend taxation contradicts government's own growth objectives and continues damaging trend of taxing return on investment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (292 words)
Jim ShannonOpposedStrangford
Tax changes hit lower and middle-income families unfairly; 4.8 million more individuals will pay higher rate and 600,000 will enter additional rate, while millionaires can afford it.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (505 words)
Sir Julian LewisNeutralNew Forest East
Government claims of fairness contradicted by numerous U-turns since Budget announcement; questions credibility of stated good effects.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (53 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0