Division · No. 448Wednesday, 11 March 2026Commons Taxation

Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 6

175
Ayes
292
Noes
Defeated · Government won
181 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 11 March 2026, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 6 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill at Report Stage -- the stage at which MPs debate and vote on changes to a Bill before it proceeds to the House of Lords. The amendment, which sought to modify the government's budget plans as set out in the Bill, was defeated by 292 votes to 175. No Labour MPs voted in favour of the amendment. **Why it matters:** The Finance (No. 2) Bill is the primary vehicle through which the government translates its Budget into law, covering taxation, spending powers and related fiscal measures. Defeating Amendment 6 means the government's original proposals in that area of the Bill remain intact. Media coverage around this period has focused heavily on Air Passenger Duty, which is due to rise from April 2026, and this amendment appears connected to right-of-centre concerns about the overall tax burden imposed by the Bill -- though the debate extracts available do not make the precise subject of Amendment 6 explicit. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Conservatives (95 votes), Liberal Democrats (53), the Scottish National Party (7), Reform UK (8), Plaid Cymru (4) and the Democratic Unionist Party (2) all voted for the amendment, forming an opposition bloc of 175. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against, joined by four Green MPs. This sits within a broader pattern of the government defending its Budget legislation against sustained opposition pressure -- a pattern also visible in votes the following week on the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill, where the government similarly defeated Lords amendments by comparable margins.

Voting Aye meant
Support removing the Government's inheritance tax changes on agricultural property, arguing the policy harms family farms and is based on false claims about farmers' wealth
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the Government's approach of reforming agricultural inheritance tax relief while raising thresholds, arguing it is fair and fiscally necessary
§ 01Who voted how.467 voting members · 181 absent
Aye176No293DID NOT VOTE · 181

467 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 181 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
255
107
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
53
0
19
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
31
11
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UKWhipped Aye
8
0
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
4
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
Government minister defending amendments as technical clarifications and necessary measures to deliver economic stability, support public services, and control borrowing without raising main income tax rates or VAT.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,922 words)
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes Bill's £66 billion tax rises, frozen thresholds affecting 1 million higher-rate taxpayers, inheritance tax on farms/businesses breaking PM pledge, and pension inheritance tax; argues measures stifle growth and break manifesto commitments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,967 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Challenges Government on £66 billion tax discrepancy versus manifesto promise of £7 billion; argues tax rises penalise hard-working people creating wealth while benefits spending rises to £406 billion.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (220 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Supports Government tax decisions as enabling NHS investment and reducing A&E waits; sees fiscal responsibility and public service investment as justifying measures.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (69 words)
Ms Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Strongly supports new clause 4 cracking down on tax avoidance finfluencers; argues online tax misinformation causes real financial harm to constituents, particularly vulnerable low-income groups following false advice.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (745 words)
Mr Joshua ReynoldsQuestioningMaidenhead
Questions whether loan charge settlement excludes those who already settled, arguing retrospective application would simplify tax system and preserve future settlement credibility.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (258 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0