Division · No. 446Wednesday, 11 March 2026Commons Taxation

Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11

174
Ayes
292
Noes
Defeated · Government won
180 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 11 March 2026, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 11 during the report stage of the Finance (No. 2) Bill -- the legislation enacting the government's budget measures. The clause, proposed by opposition parties, would have added new fiscal provisions to the Bill. It was defeated by 292 votes to 174, with the government's position prevailing comfortably. **Why it matters:** The Finance (No. 2) Bill is the primary vehicle through which the government translates its budget into law, covering taxation, duties and related fiscal measures. Media coverage in the weeks surrounding this vote focused heavily on Air Passenger Duty, which was set to rise from April 2026, with travellers urged to book flights before 1 April to avoid higher charges. New Clause 11's defeat means the government's original budget proposals on such matters remain intact, without the additional fiscal measures the opposition sought to introduce. **The politics:** The vote divided sharply along government-versus-opposition lines. All Labour and Labour/Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the clause (288 combined), while Conservatives (96), Liberal Democrats (53), the SNP (7), Reform UK (7), Plaid Cymru (4) and the DUP (2) all voted in favour -- an unusually broad opposition alliance. Notably, the Greens voted with the government against the clause. The vote sits within a period of sustained parliamentary pressure on Labour's fiscal agenda, including a series of government victories in March 2026 on National Insurance Contributions legislation, where the Commons repeatedly rejected Lords amendments by margins of around 115 votes.

Voting Aye meant
Support indexing agricultural inheritance tax thresholds to inflation and rising land values to protect family farmers from fiscal drag
Voting No meant
Oppose mandatory indexation of agricultural inheritance tax thresholds, preferring to keep fixed thresholds as set in the legislation
§ 01Who voted how.466 voting members · 180 absent
Aye176No294DID NOT VOTE · 180

466 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 180 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
257
105
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
96
0
20
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
53
0
19
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
31
11
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
3
2
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
Government minister defending amendments as technical clarifications and necessary measures to deliver economic stability, support public services, and control borrowing without raising main income tax rates or VAT.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,922 words)
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes Bill's £66 billion tax rises, frozen thresholds affecting 1 million higher-rate taxpayers, inheritance tax on farms/businesses breaking PM pledge, and pension inheritance tax; argues measures stifle growth and break manifesto commitments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,967 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Challenges Government on £66 billion tax discrepancy versus manifesto promise of £7 billion; argues tax rises penalise hard-working people creating wealth while benefits spending rises to £406 billion.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (220 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Supports Government tax decisions as enabling NHS investment and reducing A&E waits; sees fiscal responsibility and public service investment as justifying measures.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (69 words)
Ms Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Strongly supports new clause 4 cracking down on tax avoidance finfluencers; argues online tax misinformation causes real financial harm to constituents, particularly vulnerable low-income groups following false advice.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (745 words)
Mr Joshua ReynoldsQuestioningMaidenhead
Questions whether loan charge settlement excludes those who already settled, arguing retrospective application would simplify tax system and preserve future settlement credibility.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (258 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0