Division · No. 447Wednesday, 11 March 2026Commons Taxation

Finance (No. 2) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 5

172
Ayes
283
Noes
Defeated · Government won
192 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened**: On 11 March 2026, MPs voted on Amendment 5 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill at Report Stage -- the legislative phase where the full House of Commons considers proposed changes to a bill after it has been through detailed committee scrutiny. The amendment, put forward from the right of the political spectrum as a challenge to the government's budget proposals, was defeated by 283 votes to 172. The government successfully defended its original fiscal legislation. **Why it matters**: The Finance (No. 2) Bill is the legal vehicle through which the government enacts the tax and spending measures announced in the Budget. Amendment 5 sought to modify those measures, though the limited debate extracts available do not allow precise identification of the specific provision targeted. The bill's passage matters practically to taxpayers and businesses: media coverage around this period focused heavily on increases to Air Passenger Duty taking effect from April 2026, suggesting tax rises affecting travellers were among the live policy changes embedded in the legislation. Defeating the amendment keeps the government's original fiscal plans on course. **The politics**: The vote split almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment (283 Noes), while Conservatives (96), Liberal Democrats (52), Reform UK (7), the Greens (4), Plaid Cymru (4), and several smaller parties and independents all voted in favour. This broad but ultimately outnumbered cross-opposition alliance reflects the standard dynamic of a majority government holding its budget legislation intact. The vote sits within a wider pattern of fiscal confrontation: in late March 2026, the government also successfully defeated multiple Lords amendments to the National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill, consistently winning those divisions by margins of around 115 votes -- suggesting a government confident in its parliamentary majority on economic matters.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Conservative amendment on income tax thresholds, signalling opposition to Labour's tax and spending approach
Voting No meant
Reject the Conservative amendment, backing the government's existing income tax threshold policy as part of restoring fiscal order
§ 01Who voted how.455 voting members · 192 absent
Aye173No285DID NOT VOTE · 192

455 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 192 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
253
109
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
96
0
20
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
52
0
20
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
30
12
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
1
0
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Dan TomlinsonSupportiveChipping Barnet
Government minister defending amendments as technical clarifications and necessary measures to deliver economic stability, support public services, and control borrowing without raising main income tax rates or VAT.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,922 words)
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes Bill's £66 billion tax rises, frozen thresholds affecting 1 million higher-rate taxpayers, inheritance tax on farms/businesses breaking PM pledge, and pension inheritance tax; argues measures stifle growth and break manifesto commitments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,967 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Challenges Government on £66 billion tax discrepancy versus manifesto promise of £7 billion; argues tax rises penalise hard-working people creating wealth while benefits spending rises to £406 billion.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (220 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Supports Government tax decisions as enabling NHS investment and reducing A&E waits; sees fiscal responsibility and public service investment as justifying measures.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (69 words)
Ms Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Strongly supports new clause 4 cracking down on tax avoidance finfluencers; argues online tax misinformation causes real financial harm to constituents, particularly vulnerable low-income groups following false advice.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (745 words)
Mr Joshua ReynoldsQuestioningMaidenhead
Questions whether loan charge settlement excludes those who already settled, arguing retrospective application would simplify tax system and preserve future settlement credibility.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (258 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0