Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: Third Reading
320
Ayes
—
171
Noes
Passed · Government won
159 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened**: The House of Commons gave final approval to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill on 20 October 2025, passing it at Third Reading by 320 votes to 171. Third Reading is the final stage at which the Commons votes on the complete text of a bill before it proceeds to the House of Lords. The government, which backed the bill, secured a comfortable majority of 149 votes. **Why it matters**: The bill provides the legislative framework for arrangements governing the Diego Garcia military base in the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). Diego Garcia hosts a strategically significant joint UK-US military installation in the Indian Ocean. The legislation forms part of a broader diplomatic process regarding the future of the territory, which has been the subject of negotiations touching on sovereignty, the rights of the Chagossian people who were displaced from the islands, and the continued operation of the base. Passing the bill advances the government's stated objective of placing the base's legal footing on a secure and internationally recognised basis. **The politics**: The vote divided sharply along party lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the bill, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party voted unanimously against. Plaid Cymru and the Green Party, parties that might have been expected to oppose the bill on anti-colonial grounds, instead voted in favour, representing a cross-party grouping on the government's side. The debate generated significant controversy earlier in the same day, with multiple amendment votes failing before the bill's final passage, suggesting strong and organised opposition that nonetheless fell well short of the government's parliamentary majority.
Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Bill and proceeding with the sovereignty transfer to Mauritius, backing the government's treaty to secure the long-term future of the Diego Garcia military base
Voting No meant
Oppose the Bill in its current form, arguing the government should first publish legal advice and risk assessments before ceding British sovereignty over the territory
491 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 159 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
272
0
90
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
95
21
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0
63
9
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
31
0
11
Independent
5
3
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped No
0
7
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
—
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
—
Your Party
1
0
—
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0