Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: Amendment 7
174
Ayes
—
321
Noes
Defeated · Government won
154 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on Amendment 7 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill during its Committee stage on 20 October 2025. The amendment, which sought to modify the terms or conditions of the military base arrangements, was defeated by 321 votes to 174. The government's position was to oppose the amendment, and its majority held comfortably. **Why it matters:** The Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill governs the legal framework for the continued operation of a strategically significant military installation in the Indian Ocean, used jointly by the United Kingdom and the United States. Amendment 7 sought to introduce changes focused on accountability or conditions attached to those arrangements. Its defeat means the bill proceeds without those modifications, leaving the government's negotiated terms intact. The outcome directly affects the legal basis on which the base operates, with implications for UK defence commitments, diplomatic agreements with the United States, and the rights associated with the territory. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government's position, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice all voted for the amendment. Three independents supported the amendment and six opposed it, while Plaid Cymru and the Greens voted with the government. The Conservatives mustered 95 votes and the Liberal Democrats 64, forming the core of the 174-strong opposition bloc. This pattern repeated across multiple votes on the same bill the same day, with the government winning every division by a similar margin. The bill subsequently passed its Third Reading by 320 votes to 171, confirming that the government's negotiated position on Diego Garcia survived all opposition challenges intact.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to publish its legal justification for ceding sovereignty of BIOT to Mauritius before the treaty can take effect, arguing greater parliamentary scrutiny is needed over a major national security decision.
Voting No meant
Oppose delaying the treaty by demanding publication of legal advice, backing the government's position that the treaty should proceed without this additional parliamentary hurdle.
495 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 154 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
272
90
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
33
9
Independent
3
6
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
3
1
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
0
1
—
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0