Division · No. 315Monday, 20 October 2025Commons Defence and Foreign Affairs

Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: Amendment 9

83
Ayes
319
Noes
Defeated · Government won
248 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** On 20 October 2025, MPs voted on Amendment 9 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill during its Committee stage. The amendment, which sought enhanced parliamentary oversight or modified terms for the military base arrangements, was defeated by 319 votes to 83. **Why it matters:** The Diego Garcia Bill concerns the legal framework governing the UK's military base on Diego Garcia, part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, and relates to the broader treaty negotiated with Mauritius over sovereignty of the Chagos Islands. Amendment 9 aimed to alter the terms under which the base would operate, likely by introducing greater scrutiny mechanisms or revised conditions. Its defeat means the government's preferred framework for the base arrangements proceeds without the additional constraints or oversight provisions the amendment would have introduced. **The politics:** The vote saw an unusual cross-party coalition of 83 MPs supporting the amendment, drawn mainly from the Liberal Democrats (63 votes), alongside smaller contributions from Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Scottish National Party, and a handful of Conservatives and Independents. Labour and the Co-operative Party MPs voted solidly against, providing the 319 No votes. Notably, the overwhelming majority of Conservative MPs were absent rather than voting against the amendment, a pattern that recurred across several divisions on this bill the same day. The result mirrors closely the pattern of other amendments to the same bill defeated on the same date.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the treaty to include legally binding rights of return and resettlement for Chagossians before it can come into force, prioritising indigenous rights
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the treaty as negotiated and rejecting changes that the government argues would undermine the deal and UK international credibility
§ 01Who voted how.402 voting members · 248 absent
Aye86No315DID NOT VOTE · 248

402 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 248 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
271
91
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
112
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
63
0
9
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
33
9
Independent
1
6
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
3
0
6
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
3
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (5,114 words)
Stephen DoughtySupportiveCardiff South and Penarth
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words)
Dr Al PinkertonOpposedSurrey Heath
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words)
Mr Calvin BaileySupportiveLeyton and Wanstead
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words)
Stuart AndersonOpposedSouth Shropshire
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (740 words)
Sir Edward LeighOpposedGainsborough
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,140 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0