Division · No. 317Monday, 20 October 2025Commons Defence and Foreign Affairs

Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: New Clause 1

172
Ayes
322
Noes
Defeated · Government won
154 did not vote
Analysis
Commons

**What happened:** The House of Commons voted on New Clause 1 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill during its committee stage on 20 October 2025. The clause, which sought to add conditions or oversight mechanisms to the arrangements governing the Diego Garcia military base, was defeated by 322 votes to 172. **Why it matters:** The defeat of New Clause 1 means the Diego Garcia Bill will proceed without the additional conditions or parliamentary oversight provisions that the opposition sought to attach. The bill governs the legal framework for the UK's military base arrangements on Diego Garcia, a strategically significant installation in the Indian Ocean used jointly with the United States. By voting down the clause, the government preserved its preferred approach, maintaining executive flexibility over how the base is operated and how any treaty arrangements are implemented, rather than subjecting those arrangements to additional statutory conditions. **The politics:** The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative Party members voting did so against the clause, while Conservatives (94), Liberal Democrats (64), Reform UK (7), the Democratic Unionist Party (4) and Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted in favour. Notably, the Greens and Plaid Cymru voted with the government against the clause, departing from the broader opposition bloc. The result closely mirrors other divisions on the same bill the same day, suggesting a consistent whipping pattern throughout committee stage, with the government ultimately winning the bill's third reading by 320 votes to 171.

Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the treaty's entry into force until the government publishes its legal advice and analysis of international law obligations underpinning the decision to cede sovereignty to Mauritius
Voting No meant
Oppose delaying the treaty, backing the government's position that the Diego Garcia deal should proceed without the precondition of publishing detailed legal advice
§ 01Who voted how.494 voting members · 154 absent
Aye173No322DID NOT VOTE · 154

494 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 154 who did not vote.

Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped No
0
273
89
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0
33
9
Independent
2
7
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UKWhipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0
3
1
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
Your Party
0
1
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,114 words)
Stephen DoughtySupportiveCardiff South and Penarth
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words)
Dr Al PinkertonOpposedSurrey Heath
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words)
Mr Calvin BaileySupportiveLeyton and Wanstead
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words)
Stuart AndersonOpposedSouth Shropshire
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (740 words)
Sir Edward LeighOpposedGainsborough
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,140 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0