Women’s State Pension age (Ombudsman report and compensation scheme): Ten Minute Rule Motion
105
Ayes
—
0
Noes
Passed · Government lost
541 did not vote
Analysis
Commons
Commons
**What happened:** On 28 January 2025, the House of Commons passed a Ten Minute Rule Motion calling for the government to establish a compensation scheme for women affected by changes to the state pension age, in response to a Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman report on the matter. The motion passed by 105 votes to 0, with no MPs voting against it. **Why it matters:** The motion concerns women born in the 1950s whose state pension age was raised from 60 to 66, many of whom say they received inadequate notice of the change. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found that the Department for Work and Pensions failed in its communication of the changes and recommended financial remedies. The motion, if translated into government policy, would require the creation of a formal compensation scheme for those affected, potentially involving significant public expenditure. The women most affected, often referred to as WASPI women (Women Against State Pension Inequality), have campaigned for redress for several years. **The politics:** The vote was notable for what was absent as much as what was present. While 105 MPs voted in favour, 351 Labour MPs did not vote, and the Labour government's position on the motion was recorded as unclear. The Liberal Democrats led the charge with 62 Ayes, making up the largest bloc of supporters. Eight independents, eight SNP members, five Democratic Unionist Party members, and small numbers from the Greens, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, and the Conservatives also backed the motion. The result reflects broad but thin cross-party sympathy for the WASPI cause, set against a government that has not committed to implementing the Ombudsman's recommendations.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to address the Ombudsman's findings and establish a compensation scheme for WASPI women affected by state pension age increases
Voting No meant
Oppose compelling the government to introduce compensation measures for women affected by state pension age changes (no MPs voted No)
105 voting MPs. Each dot is one vote; left-to-right by party. Grey dots in the centre are the 541 who did not vote.
Aye
No
Absent
Labour PartyWhipped Aye
11
0
351
Conservative and Unionist Party
2
0
114
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
0
0
42
Independent
8
0
6
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
8
1
—
Reform UK
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5
0
—
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3
1
—
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
—
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
—
Your Party
1
0
—
The government must establish a compensation scheme for WASPI women as determined by the Ombudsman; the current refusal breaks explicit pre-election promises and compounds historical gender-based injustices faced by these women.Scottish National Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,570 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0