The local authorityCouncil · county · england · 1 of 21 councils (county)

Cambridgeshire County Council.

Council with no overall control county. £595m net revenue. 98 wards across 7 parliamentary constituencies. Comprises 5 districts: Cambridge, East Cambridgeshire, Fenland, Huntingdonshire, South Cambridgeshire.

Typecounty
Seats0 councillors · 98 wards
Net revenue · 2025-26
£595m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
/0
Westminster
7
constituencies overlap · 3 MP parties
Dispatch
8 Jun 2026

Council chamber, 3-party MP geography.

Cambridgeshire County Council is a county with no overall control. Net revenue is £595m for 2025-26. It covers 98 wards spanning 7 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 3 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§Districts.5 districts · Band D £2,355–£2,440
DistrictBand D billCounty tax sourcedWards
Cambridge£2,355.41£77.8m14
East Cambridgeshire£2,374.13£59.3m14
Fenland£2,432.81£56.1m18
Huntingdonshire£2,439.67£113.8m26
South Cambridgeshire£2,414.52£119.0m26

Band D is the full household bill (county + district + police + fire + parish). “County tax sourced” is Cambridgeshire County Council’s own precept (£1700.64/yr at Band D) collected through each district’s tax base — totalling £422.4m.

§ 01Composition.0 seats

Who sits in the chamber.

Councillors — the people.

Councillor data not yet ingested for Cambridgeshire County Council.

§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

71%
Council tax
£422.4m · median 66%
23%
Central grants
£135.8m · median 27%
6%
Business rates
£36.8m · median 7%

This is a high-council-tax councils (county): 71% of revenue from council tax, above the cohort median (66%).

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,701

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 20 other councils (county)

How does Cambridgeshire County Council split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (county)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education39.7% of net spend · cohort median 40%
12 of 21-2% vs median
Adult Social Care33.1% of net spend · cohort median 31%
7 of 21+5% vs median
Children's Services12.1% of net spend · cohort median 14%
16 of 21-12% vs median
Waste & Recycling4.8% of net spend · cohort median 3%
2 of 21+40% vs median
Public Health3.5% of net spend · cohort median 3%
6 of 21+4% vs median
Highways & Transport3.3% of net spend · cohort median 4%
18 of 21-19% vs median
Corporate & Central2.4% of net spend · cohort median 1%
4 of 21+73% vs median
Culture & Leisure0.7% of net spend · cohort median 1%
21 of 21-28% vs median
Housing & Homelessness0.2% of net spend · cohort median 0%
10 of 18-2% vs median
Planning & Economic Development0.2% of net spend · cohort median 0%
17 of 21-24% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.19,270 payments · £145.4m gross · 3 Dec 202530 Jan 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED£13.71m9.4%2
THALIA WB SPV LIMITED£10.30m7.1%9
REDACTED PERSONAL DATA£4.25m2.9%2,907
CONNECT ROADS CAMBRIDGESHIRE LIMITED£3.92m2.7%5
PETERBOROUGH CITY COUNCIL£3.01m2.1%28
MORGAN SINDALL CONSTRUCTION & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD£2.93m2.0%2
OCTAVIUS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED£2.74m1.9%11
CAMBRIDGESHIRE COMMUNITY SERVICES NHS TRUST£2.67m1.8%20
THE RIVERSIDE GROUP LTD£2.67m1.8%16
CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND PETERBOROUGH COMBINED AUTHORITY£2.40m1.6%7

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
EducationGRETTON SCHOOL£2.14m
Childrens ServicesREDACTED PERSONAL DATA£0.88m
Corporate And CentralREDACTED PERSONAL DATA£0.38m
Adult Social CareREDACTED PERSONAL DATA£0.06m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.98 wards split across 7 parliamentary seats

Cambridgeshire County Council’s territory crosses 7 Westminster constituencies, with 3 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
North East Cambridgeshire1818% Steve BarclayCon
Huntingdon1717% Ben Obese-JectyCon
South Cambridgeshire1717% Pippa HeylingsLD
Ely and East Cambridgeshire1616% Charlotte CaneLD
St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire1515% Ian SollomLD
Cambridge1212% Daniel ZeichnerLab
North West Cambridgeshire33% Sam CarlingLab
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 3 LD, 2 Lab and 2 Con MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a -controlled county — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 20 other councils (county)
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
19,270 payments · 3 Dec 202530 Jan 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level