The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 240 contributions

Speeches by Qureshi.

Every Hansard contribution by Yasmin Qureshi this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 121140 of 240 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 7 of 12Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

I want to comment on two points. First, I agree entirely with the speech of the hon. Member for Chichester on the problem with clause 3 and jury allocation, and I especially agree with her point about the retrospective reallocation of cases, whereby people waiting for trial by jury will suddenly find that their case wi

crime
885
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

However—this is very important—most continental systems start from a different premise. As I said previously, our system is considered to be adversarial, but theirs are considered to be inquisitorial, which is about finding out what has gone wrong. One big difference in our system is that if a police officer arrests so

crimesocial-care
162
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

I agree with the hon. Member. I want to set out why we have a backlog and what we can do. Everybody has talked about various things that we could do, such as triaging the cases more effectively and more routinely, like Liverpool Crown court and some of the others that have seen a considerable reduction. There are the i

crime
170
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

I entirely agree. The state of some of the courts in this country is sad. They are completely neglected, which creates a lot of challenges.

crime
25
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

The Institute for Government also said that juries do not take up that much time—they save more time. The point is that, without too much difficulty, we could get the courts up and running and working for extra sitting days. Essentially, if we had more court sitting days, we would not have the backlog; it is not the ju

crime
64
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

In a moment. The main reason why the Government have cited is the backlog. What I am trying to say is that it is not the juries that cause the backlog. It is quite clearly the case that, with investment in court structures and court personnel, the courts could be fully up and running, and we could probably get rid of t

crime
85
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

That is absolutely correct. Of course, one of the reasons why some people left the criminal Bar is the fact that the legal aid funding was not great, but I assure Members that if they did not have other work to do, they would come back to the Bar. There are enough barristers and solicitors in the legal system for that.

crime
61
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

No, because let’s face it: in the jury trials we are talking about, people are not getting sentences of more than three years. There is hardly going to be a King’s counsel dealing with those cases—it is not even going to be a leading junior who will deal with those cases. A lot of the barristers will be middle ranking;

crime
83
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I will not press my amendment to a vote. In fact, Ms Butler, I notify you and the Committee that I am not asking to vote on any of my amendments.

crimesocial-care
31
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Sir Brian Leveson recommended that a case should be heard by the Crown court bench division, with no right to a jury trial, only if it carried a potential sentence of 24 months or more. To change the maximum sentencing period in the magistrates court without proper consultation and debate in Parliament is a fundamental

crimesocial-care
88
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

My hon. Friend the Member for Amber Valley mentioned that the youth court can sentence someone to up to two years’ imprisonment. There is one big difference: youth courts often deal with indictable offences. Some of those youngsters are charged with really serious offences that would go straight to the Crown court if a

crimesocial-care
113
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

When we were having all the various debates about legislation as we were exiting the European Union, we in the Opposition, among others, argued that the Government should not use Henry VIII provisions to essentially sweep changes along and make laws without proper debate. The then-Government were rolling up a whole lot

crimesocial-care
82
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

I think I am possibly the oldest person in this room. As somebody who was prosecuting, defending and dealing with criminal cases back in the late ’80s, ’90s, 2000s and so on, I saw the criminal justice system at first hand. When I started practising at the Bar, we had full legal aid at all levels, so whenever defendant

crime
148
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

The amendment would add to proposed new section 74C of the Senior Courts Act, which concerns matters that must be taken into account when determining allocation in cases that are already set to have a jury trial. Amendment 26 would add two further conditions that must be considered when making such allocation decisions

crimefiscal-policy
268
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 26, in clause 3, page 8, line 36, at end insert— “(h) fairness when considering the rights and circumstances of the defendant; (i) the interests of justice.”

crimefiscal-policy
32
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I will speak to amendment 28, regarding page 9, line 20 of the Bill. Essentially, the amendment states that, if the prosecution and defence waive their right to a hearing, the court can then make a determination under proposed new section 74AB of the Senior Courts Act 1981. That proposed new section, which will be intr

crimefiscal-policy
91
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I will not say any more. I think we have discussed retrospectivity enough. As I have said from the beginning, retrospective legislation is always a bad idea, in any country. People are entitled to certainty about the law. If we start eroding that fundamental principle, God knows where we will stop. I do not intend to p

crimefiscal-policy
86
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

Does the hon. Member agree that trying to divide our citizens into victims and defendants—the good and the bad—is not the best way forward? Defendants can themselves be victims, and victims can become defendants. It is important that we have a system of principle that applies to everyone. There is an assumption that we

crimefiscal-policy
76
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Jardine. Amendment 25 relates to the retrospective allocation of cases to the Crown court bench division. I am asking that provisions for the allocation for trial without jury do not apply when election has already happened. The point is that in all jurisprudence in

crimefiscal-policy
304
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 25, in clause 3, page 5, line 38, at end insert— “(7) The preceding provisions on allocation for trial without a jury do not apply to cases where a defendant has already elected to be tried in the Crown Court prior to the commencement of this section.”

crimefiscal-policy
52
← PreviousPage 7 of 12 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.