The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,230 contributions

Speeches by Munt.

Every Hansard contribution by Tessa Munt this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 161180 of 1,230 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 9 of 62Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

It is very sweet of you to suggest that, but no, because I need to be absolutely certain. It is the reason I do not just go wanging around the library or searching on the internet in the first place. What I want to see are the facts, and I want the data. I understand that I could use AI. Maybe, in a decade’s time, I wi

146
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

It is very sweet of you to suggest that, but no, because I need to be absolutely certain. It is the reason I do not just go wanging around the library or searching on the internet in the first place. What I want to see are the facts, and I want the data. I understand that I could use AI. Maybe, in a decade’s time, I wi

146
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am sure that it could.

6
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am sure that it could.

6
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Never.

1
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Of course, that is absolutely fine. There are occasions when things are carded. I am told that some of my questions are argumentative and that I am not allowed to be argumentative, and I would say to you that I am never argumentative. I am seeking facts; I want data and I want to be able to back up what I am presupposi

102
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Never.

1
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I will do that, shall I? Thank you.

8
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Yes. There are a number of frustrations in the system as it exists. It is not perfect. If I may, I will refer to the notes that I brought because I want to use various examples. I have experience of Departments avoiding substantive answers. By that I mean that sometimes they will try to avoid answering by saying that i

829
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Of course, that is absolutely fine. There are occasions when things are carded. I am told that some of my questions are argumentative and that I am not allowed to be argumentative, and I would say to you that I am never argumentative. I am seeking facts; I want data and I want to be able to back up what I am presupposi

102
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am very reliant on them. I have to say that—probably in common with any number of MPs—I have an idea of what the answer might be before I ask the question because I will have done my research beforehand, but I am very reliant on making sure that the Government are accurate in their answers.

56
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

My name is Tessa Munt and I am the MP for Wells and Mendip Hills in Somerset.

17
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I will do that, shall I? Thank you.

8
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Hang on a minute—I read them. When I wrote this with my wonderful team, I think we covered pretty much everything. Quite often, if I know I am not going to be present at a particular ministerial questions session for some reason, I will use introductory questions. Very often, those are questions that have been pre-appr

149
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Thank you for your question, but I do not stop until I have what I think is probably the answer. That has meant currying the Minister in the Tea Room and saying, “Come on, can I have an answer please?” Or we will go back again, again and again. I want to assure you that I have not asked questions that are so wide that

125
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

Yes. There are a number of frustrations in the system as it exists. It is not perfect. If I may, I will refer to the notes that I brought because I want to use various examples. I have experience of Departments avoiding substantive answers. By that I mean that sometimes they will try to avoid answering by saying that i

829
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

No! No—I just keep going.

5
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am very reliant on them. I have to say that—probably in common with any number of MPs—I have an idea of what the answer might be before I ask the question because I will have done my research beforehand, but I am very reliant on making sure that the Government are accurate in their answers.

56
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

It is very sweet of you to suggest that, but no, because I need to be absolutely certain. It is the reason I do not just go wanging around the library or searching on the internet in the first place. What I want to see are the facts, and I want the data. I understand that I could use AI. Maybe, in a decade’s time, I wi

146
3 Jun 2026Procedure Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 49)

I am sure that it could.

6
← PreviousPage 9 of 62 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.