Speeches by Munt.
Every Hansard contribution by Tessa Munt this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 301–320 of 1,230 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “It was not.” | 3 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “Who takes precedence? Who is right?” | 6 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “I am talking about prior to that.” | 7 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “That is absolutely fine; I accept that. How do you make the Law Society behave?” | 15 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “If I return to my question, do you feel that the SRA has the powers and competencies that it needs to regulate new technologies? I can see that you are working on it, but do you feel you have the powers? In the long run, for us this is about access to justice. I can understand how individual firms will populate AI with…” | 102 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “It probably is.” | 3 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “Sorry to interrupt you; why not?” | 6 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “I do not want to finish on a downer, but I would like to try to unravel some of the Mazur stuff. You just referred to the fact that you have a close relationship with the Law Society, and yet, as far as I can see, if we look at the Mazur judgment, the Law Society took a completely different view from yours. Your effect…” | 212 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “If I can pick up on that, Anna, I think you said in 2022 that there was “an appetite” to move towards a single legal services regulator. I wonder whether you still feel that is the right way to go, and whether a single legal services regulator would be preferable to the current situation.” | 54 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “You can be free, because you are just about to leave.” | 11 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “If you were going to start with a blank sheet of paper, what would we have?” | 16 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “It is not going to stop, is it? There is no end point when you are going to go, “Okay, fine. Now we need this.”” | 25 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “From you?” | 2 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “No, but you have the experience.” | 6 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “I do not want to finish on a downer, but I would like to try to unravel some of the Mazur stuff. You just referred to the fact that you have a close relationship with the Law Society, and yet, as far as I can see, if we look at the Mazur judgment, the Law Society took a completely different view from yours. Your effect…” | 212 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “Good afternoon. My name is Tessa Munt. I am the Member of Parliament for Wells and Mendip Hills. I am also a director and a vice-chair of WhistleblowersUK, which is a not-for-profit organisation, and vice-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on penal affairs.” | 43 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “But that was clearly a four-year period of utter mayhem for everybody.” | 12 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “It probably is.” | 3 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “But it did not.” | 4 |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1247) “I want to ask you about your response to the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Mazur. You said that you will “continue to hold regulators to account” to ensure that there is a clear approach across the sector to reserved legal activities. What does that mean?” | 47 |