The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 556 contributions

Speeches by Lightwood.

Every Hansard contribution by Simon Lightwood this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 361380 of 556 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 19 of 28Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

This goes back to the bus service improvement plans, as well. That is the mechanism in which they identify future changes and improvements in their bus network, whereas the socially necessary bit is more about how we protect, and make sure that there are processes, when it comes to designation.

50
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I think that the provisions in the Bill mandate them to identify socially necessary bus services. They have to do that as part of an enhanced partnership.

27
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I take that point, but this is why we have bus service improvement plans. That is fundamentally what it is about. You are asked to consider, as part of that, your aspirations, and as part of that you would look at gaps in service. I would expect that. I am sure that, in guidance, it says you need to take consideration

70
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I don’t know if it does. That is part of the accepted challenge for local transport authorities. They want to deliver the best service possible for their areas. Those criteria could be used, but it is about protections, and reassurance to passengers on existing services. It is the trust issue again—that every possible

73
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

This goes back to the conversation and the work that is going to have to take place in each of those enhanced partnerships, and possibly franchising, about the kinds of bus services the local communities want, and the Government then empowering those local communities with the tools and funding to achieve those objecti

53
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

We will look at guidance to local transport authorities about what they may want to include in that. It is up to local areas, again, to set what they think is socially necessary in their specific communities, rather than having us tell them what we think it should be. It will be different in different areas; there will

71
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Again, the word “you” is the issue. What do local areas want to see from that? It is about empowering them to do that. I guess what I would like, as I said earlier, would be for passengers to be at the centre of that thinking, with a full exploration of the benefit that the services provide to a community, and for pass

123
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

It is crucial to say that that is an interim formula. We will continue to work with local transport authorities and operators to hone that approach. How best do we share that funding across the country, to deliver the results that we need to see, bearing in mind the challenges faced by certain communities?

54
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

You have already seen in the changes that we have made in our approach to the bus grant, which consolidated BSIP and BSOG funding, that because it is done on a formula basis, all local transport authorities, including those in more rural and suburban areas, have received funding, sometimes for the first time in a long

76
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

I am going to gracefully look at my colleague, who has been very close to the enhanced partnership review.

19
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Certainly, I take your point. In the bus Bill there are socially necessary bus services. The same kind of consideration is undertaken when a local transport authority is considering the move to franchising. They need to clearly demonstrate the benefit to the community. I am minded to look again at whether the socially

213
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

The grant point is important. Local areas need to set grant conditions to incentivise the behaviours and changes that they want to see in their local area, which will be different across different geographies and areas of the country. Again, it is about another way of empowering them to shape and take control of their

57
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

First and foremost, it is important to say that enhanced partnerships are hugely valuable in delivering better bus services. We have seen some great partnership there. They are a statutory partnership and certainly not just a piece of paper. If an operator in that partnership fails to comply with the local transport au

250
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Absolutely. I think that increases the transparency. We are designing that database now. It will go out to tender and be in place in due course. I do not think this is going to add more burden on to anybody. The data is already commonly collected. As you say, often GPS data is collected already, and it is about putting

74
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Yes.

1
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

What we need to do now is to put it in one single place. If you make it available, for instance, to Google Maps or Apple Maps, it is open for all of those issues.

35
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

No, not at all. Local transport authorities already have legal powers to request that data when they are considering franchising. That already exists. Operators are required by law to provide that data when authorities are considering that. Going beyond that now, in the bus services Bill, there are elements about data

233
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

Yes.

1
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

This is why we are doing the pilots. What is often quoted when it comes to the Manchester model is that there is something like £700 million to £1 billion. Our analysis is around £135 million. That took them a long time. It was complicated. They were the trailblazer, and good for them. They have shown what is possible.

95
14 May 2025Transport Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 494)

We have invested something like £1 billion in buses just in 2025-26, and £700 million is going directly to local authorities to spend on whatever they see fit in terms of improving buses for passengers. In addition, we have a whole support package around how we support local authorities on enhanced partnerships and ide

66
← PreviousPage 19 of 28 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.