The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,040 contributions

Speeches by Olney.

Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Olney this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 81100 of 1,040 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 5 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
11 Jun 2026Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-06-11)

When do you expect to have finalised your costs estimate?

10
11 Jun 2026Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-06-11)

Are you actively pursuing decommissioning for some of the estate?

10
11 Jun 2026Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-06-11)

Professor Dougherty, I want to ask you about the estate. The Science and Technology Facilities Council manages a lot of the estate where research is conducted, but we know that it is currently spending only about £6 million a year managing the estate. In its Report, the NAO says that that is far below what needs to be

96
11 Jun 2026Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-06-11)

I wonder whether you can give an example of a recent weighing up between two different projects and explain how you came down on one side rather than the other. Given that it is very difficult, an example would be helpful.

41
11 Jun 2026Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-06-11)

Sir Ian, when we have decision makers from very different strands of science and tech and you are trying to make decisions about how to allocate budget, how are you able to look at different types of research? How can you evaluate them against each other?

46
11 Jun 2026Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-06-11)

If you have competing projects that are scoring highly on all those counts, do you then have to weigh things up against each other when they are in very different spheres? Have you had that experience?

36
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

(b) an amount so authorised by resolution of the House of Commons, whichever is higher.”—(Sarah Olney.)

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
16
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Brought up, and read the First time.

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
7
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

(a) £500m, or

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
3
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

Question put, That the clause be read a Second time.

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
10
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

“(1) The total amount of compensation paid by the Secretary of State under Part 2 and financial assistance paid under section 58 is limited to—

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
25
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
0
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
0
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
0
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
0
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
0
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
0
9 Jun 2026Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

I beg to ask leave to withdraw amendment 7. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clauses 52 to 57 ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 58 Financial assistance Amendment proposed: 20, page 39, line 7, at end insert— “(1A) The Secretary of State may only provide financial assistance under this section if they are satisfi

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
72
9 Jun 2026
intervention
Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

It would take just hours to do that. All we are asking for is a safeguard. Without any kind of safeguard, what does the hon. Lady think would be an acceptable amount for the Government to offer in exchange for taking on a steel undertaking? Does she think that no limit at all would be acceptable? We are merely proposin

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
79
9 Jun 2026
intervention
Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill

The hon. Lady referred specifically to our new clause. Does she not accept that we are merely asking for a further parliamentary vote if the proposed consideration for transfer exceeds a certain level, and that that is a sensible and workable way forward? Not only do we need to be open to the possibility of enabling th

economy-jobsdefenceenvironment
83
← PreviousPage 5 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.