Speeches by Green.
Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Green this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 101–120 of 448 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 14 May 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-05-14) “To turn to the governance and management of the different interdependencies, paragraph 18 of the NAO Report states: “Inadequate governance of interdependencies is still hindering clusters’ planning for the value for money and delivery of shared services”. I would like to understand how you are managing your five interd…” | 93 |
| 14 May 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-05-14) “Are you confident that, if the equivalent of the problems with the ATS presented again, it would be caught sooner and addressed faster?” | 23 |
| 14 May 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-05-14) “If there is a problem, what is the route to a decision?” | 12 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-04-27) “I have a question for Mr Bisson, to understand why the Government do not see Northern Powerhouse Rail as a mega-project. Looking at figure 7 on page 28, it presents most of the characteristics of a mega-project as defined by the Government, so why has this not been designated as such?” | 51 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-04-27) “But that is a “TBC”: it is an ongoing live conversation. If I turn it on its head, given that you are on the record, what are the risks of not being designated as a mega-project?” | 36 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-04-27) “You have mentioned that it is a programme that will take us into the 2040s. Forgive me, but how will you set it up in such a way that it will survive multiple Parliaments?” | 34 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-04-27) “I am aware that we are pushed for time. May I ask if the Committee can have a note on how that is going to work in practice and how it has been working? The Committee has a real interest in making sure that we do not add additional costs on projects like this.” | 54 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-04-27) “I want to ask the permanent secretary about the nature restoration fund. What impact will it have on large infrastructure projects for which the Department is responsible?” | 27 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-04-27) “I am interested in the Thames crossing example that you just gave. I am keen to understand how it will work in practice. I have in mind the bat tunnel. HS2 was really clear that it felt that the nature and biodiversity requirements obligated it to come up with a solution such as a bat tunnel. How will we make sure that…” | 88 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-04-27) “On that, does that mean we are changing the requirements for biodiversity in nature?” | 14 |
| 23 Apr 2026 | Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency “I welcome today’s debate and congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Mid Dorset and North Poole (Vikki Slade) on securing it. I too wish to focus on the experience of those navigating the medical licence renewal process, but I begin by acknowledging that the DVLA is aware of its shortcomings in that area. When the c…” transporthealthcrime | 720 |
| 23 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-23) “Thank you. When this first came to light for our Committee, it raised real issues of accountability to Parliament, this Committee and the Comptroller and Auditor General. Permanent Secretary, have you given any thought to how the MOD would secure parliamentary budgetary approval if a similar situation occurred—not a da…” | 74 |
| 23 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-23) “No offence taken, Chair. Returning to the impact of the super-injunction: Permanent Secretary, what impact did the super-injunction itself have on the Department’s understating of the potential Afghan compensation and resettlement costs?” | 32 |
| 23 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-23) “So it was not treated differently?” | 6 |
| 23 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-23) “Not at all.” | 3 |
| 5 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-05) “It is not lost information.” | 5 |
| 5 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-05) “Is that not currently happening?” | 5 |
| 5 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-05) “Just to follow up on what you are saying, paragraph 4.8 says that the NAO was told that “if the police look into a potential fraud and decide not to pursue a case criminally, there are no clear mechanisms for other parts of the MoD to continue looking at a case to see if non-criminal routes would be appropriate.” Can y…” | 73 |
| 5 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-05) “I want to move us on to triage and how the allegations are triaged at the moment. At the end of paragraph 4.7 of the NAO Report, it states, “different teams are not aware of the criteria or thresholds different parts of the MoD use when deciding to pursue or prioritise a case.” I am keen to understand—this is a questio…” | 94 |
| 5 Mar 2026 | Public Accounts Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-03-05) “How many regional teams are there? You said you do it by area.” | 13 |