The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 454 contributions

Speeches by Bool.

Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Bool this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 454 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 23Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

It was not paid for—

5
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I just wanted to clarify some timings because when Charlie asked earlier on, you said that KKR submitted its bid to Ofwat on 30 May, but you also said that you were aware of KKR potentially drawing out on 29 May, and then not getting the financing. Can you clarify that?

51
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But either way, you were aware of KKR pulling out, but simultaneously, it put a bid in, we think.

19
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Okay. Just very quickly on that point: obviously as part of the due diligence, KKR would have been asking Thames Water a lot of questions to seek that comfort. Clearly, you could not give KKR the comfort to be able to get that financial investment sign-off. Obviously I understand about the banks. Chris, I know you said

72
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Where did those mainly fail? Which of those issues were the problem because I am sure the regulators might have been on side. I understand the future investment. Where was the weakness on the others? If KKR could, why could others not?

42
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Just to understand, you say it does not have operational capacity in water, but CKI owns 75% of Northumbrian Water. What do you mean by that compared to the creditors?

30
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Sorry, fine. If there really was a true exclusivity period, then obviously, as Charlie mentioned, the creditors were primed and ready. So was it actually a true exclusivity period if they were primed and ready?

35
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

It would have been an exclusivity agreement signed thing.

9
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

How comparable is the bid now between what the creditors are now offering and what KKR were?

17
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

They want the reset, so it was possibly always going to fail. Either way, they are going to unless you can get that.

23
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But the creditors are actually given that information because of the loan structure and funding. There could be questions raised about the comfort that KKR could not get because the creditors ultimately wanted the bid.

35
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I find this very difficult because it is incredibly serious to get to this stage after 10 weeks—

18
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But the creditors were also operating and preparing their own bid alongside KKR. Equally, to have the information that KKR needed, it would have had to speak to the creditors to get the confirmation. So it is like marking its own homework for a bid that then comes out.

49
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

—and then not be able to get your finances over the board. That is very unusual in this day and age.

21
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

You said that KKR shared information, so what information was shared? Was it ultimately its DD reports?

17
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Well, investment committee, but that is serious, and I do not think that is just politics alone, if I am being honest.

22
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I appreciate that because I completely understand that need for exclusivity and that that is what KKR would want. They want that 10-week period; it is quite common in legal transactions. I have seen that before. What I do not quite understand is once that period ended, why did you not just reopen it and give the other

67
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I have a very quick question. I understand your explanation about the penalties and the doom loop, but did the KKR bid include paying those penalties and have the creditors built in paying these penalties as part of their bid?

40
14 Jul 2025Taxes

Members across the House will be familiar with the winter of discontent. In 1979—the year our Chancellor was born—the Labour Government were at the behest of their union paymasters, and refuse piled up across the country. Fast-forward 46 years: we are a year into the Chancellor’s term of office, and we have before us a

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
393
14 Jul 2025Taxes

I can certainly give you more. The Minister and Government Members rarely want to listen, but I raise these points on behalf of my constituents, who have asked me to do this. I implore the Government: if they want growth, they must take this summer to think again about how to achieve it, or it will be an autumn of angu

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobslabour-market
61
← PreviousPage 10 of 23 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.