The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 749 contributions

Speeches by Paul.

Every Hansard contribution by Rebecca Paul this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 241260 of 749 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 13 of 38Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I thank the hon. Lady for her intervention, but I will not comment on that specifically. I am talking about the magistrates courts, which generally deal with low-level motoring offences.

crime
30
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I will look into the hon. Lady’s point, and I have no doubt that we will talk about that later on. Can a Government who pride themselves on putting victims first truly be comfortable with what I have just laid out? Those are just two examples, but we see the same pattern for numerous other serious offences such as actu

crime
232
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I thank the shadow Minister for that point; I share his concerns. There is also a question regarding whether unpaid volunteers will even want to take on such a serious role that involves handing out two-year sentences—that is quite a responsibility. The outstanding caseload in magistrates courts has been increasing in

crime
415
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crime
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

In my speech, I asked a specific question about the impact assessment. One of the options was to do nothing, and it would be helpful if the Minister could clearly articulate what was included in that option. Did it include the impact of uncapped sitting days, or of the three-year custodial sentence? Did it include all

crime
90
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crime
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I thank the Minister for that point. This goes back and links to the question I raised on the impact assessment. It is really important that we get clarity from the Minister on the impact assessment. The interpretation I am taking from her answer to me on whether existing measures like the suspension of three-year sent

crime
149
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crimeeconomy-jobs
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the Minister for her generosity in taking interventions. I think it may well be a timely point at which to deal with a quick question I raised earlier, about legal aid. Clearly, a defendant is potentially less likely to secure legal aid in the magistrates court than they are in the Crown court. I am sure the Mi

crimeeconomy-jobs
81
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

To build on the excellent points made by my hon. Friend and the hon. Member for Chichester, does this not fundamentally come down to the fact that the CPS is made up of civil servants? They are not meant to tell the Minister that they are wrong or right. That is not their job. I feel those on the Government Benches are

crimeeconomy-jobs
68
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the Minister for that explanation. I hope she will bear with me as I try to take it on board. Clauses 1 and 2 amend the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 so that a defendant charged with an either-way offence is no longer able to elect trial by jury. As was clearly established earlier today, that right to elect is e

crimeeconomy-jobs
1,903
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I would say Thursday.

crimeeconomy-jobs
4
13 Apr 2026Topical Questions

Rural areas are facing a wave of unauthorised developments on land owned by Travellers, with little or no action being taken against them. My right hon. Friend the Member for East Surrey (Claire Coutinho) and 30 of my colleagues have been pressing for national support to give new powers to the police and local authorit

housinglocal-government
78
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q I am interested in your data. Do you see any differences in different groups electing for a judge-only trial? If you do see a difference—I am talking about age and various other protected characteristics—why do you think that there is one? Doug Downey: That is a great question. I do not have data on the different gro

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
152
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q That suggests to me that if it did not save time, you would not support the proposal. Claire Waxman: But I cannot imagine it. If you are taking cases out of the Crown court that cannot deal with the pressure, that will save time.

crime
45
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

That is what we will be analysing over the next few weeks—whether it will or not.

crime
16
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q I thank you all for being here. I know that this must be incredibly difficult. You are incredibly brave, and it is wonderful to see you channelling something that was so negative for you in a positive way, so thank you for that. We have focused a lot on jury trials, but there is a real opportunity here to think about

crime
650
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q Thank you for your time, Claire. If I am interpreting your answer correctly, your basis for supporting the removal of jury trials is that it will save time and allow victims to get justice quicker. Would your position change if that is not the case and those time savings do not come through? Claire Waxman: That is im

crime
83
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

Q Today, 58 out of 516 Crown court rooms are not sitting. Do you agree that it would be better to address that issue—and how would we address it?—rather than limiting jury trials? Kirsty Brimelow: May I deal with that briefly? Absolutely, if you open the courts, then the courts can hear the cases. Also, let us look at

crimeeconomy-jobssocial-care
166
25 Mar 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (First sitting)

Q Your letter says that this will result in quicker justice for victims, and that is why you support it. My question is: if that is not the case, would you not support it? Claire Waxman: It is the case. The Crown court is overburdened. You have heard Sir Brian Leveson’s analysis; it cannot continue in the state it is i

crime
78
← PreviousPage 13 of 38 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.