The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 749 contributions

Speeches by Paul.

Every Hansard contribution by Rebecca Paul this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 749 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 38Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

The Sentencing Act 2026 now allows custodial sentences of up to three years to be suspended, and introduced presumption to suspend short custodial sentences. Those are changes that may well affect plea behaviour, sentencing outcomes and, in due course, trial volumes. They are, however, not obviously incorporated into t

crime
57
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

Colleagues will also recall the circulated letter from leaders in the violence against women and girls space, which makes the same point from another direction. It states that juries

crime
29
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“a binary choice, would prefer a judge-only trial over waiting years”.

crime
11
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

Charlotte Schreurs and others argue from lived experience that delay is intolerable, and limited reform may be preferable to a justice system that does not function at all. I do not shy away from that view. Victims are absolutely right to be angry about delay, and they are right to say that the current position is into

crime
69
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

If the Government truly believe clause 3 is fair, proportionate and necessary, why would they resist a review clause of this kind? New clause 29 has no impact on what the Government are proposing. It simply says that if you alter one of the most important protections in the criminal justice system and you know there ar

crime
149
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Does my hon. Friend agree that Government Members and the Minister have spent a lot of time talking about victims being central to all of the changes, so why on earth would they not support the amendment if it is really about protecting victims from being cross-examined?

crimesocial-care
47
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I agree with my hon. Friend, as I normally do. Finally, there is the obvious practical point that there are better answers available. The Law Society says that reform and investment must be strategic, not piecemeal, and warns against stand-alone measures such as changing from jury trials to judge-only trials without co

crimesocial-care
261
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

but

crime
1
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

The Victims’ Commissioner’s written evidence is useful because it makes clear that concerns about disproportionality are not confined to ethnicity. She says the potential impact of these reforms on women, particularly women from black and minoritised backgrounds, must be properly considered. She also notes that juries

crime
118
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“In 2021, 20% of female defendants elected compared to 14% of male defendants.”

crime
13
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“Racial disproportionality is evident through the criminal justice system”,

crime
9
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

The second limb of new clause 29 also raises an important point. Sometimes when equality concerns are raised in criminal justice debates, people hear only the ethnicity point, but this new clause is more thoughtful than that and broader in its recognition that mistrust, disadvantage and distance from the system can als

crime
108
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

That is a striking omission and is enough to justify a review clause. If the Government say they cannot currently draw firm conclusions about how judge-only trials may affect different groups, we are entitled to insist that those conclusions be developed and published once the policy is in operation. It would be consti

crime
78
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

and the one part of the criminal justice system where minorities were treated without racial bias. He is also repeatedly quoted as having said:

crime
24
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

Parliament ought to know whether a move away from jury trial bears differently on those who are poorer, more marginal, or less represented by the institutions that judge them. In other words, new clause 29 is right to say that the review should not be confined to ethnicity alone but should examine whether the move to s

crime
80
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

JUSTICE says that the Bill will not have an impact on the backlog until 2028-29, and that prison demand is not predicted to decline until 2034-35. The Institute for Government says that the gains are uncertain and may backfire. The Bar Council, the Law Society and others say that alternative productivity measures could

crime
85
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

For all those reasons, I oppose clause 3 standing part of the Bill. It rests on an arbitrary and unstable three-year threshold and asks courts to make constitutionally significant decisions at exactly the stage when the evidence is often incomplete, but then tries to patch over that unreliability through reallocation,

crime
223
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

When new clause 29 asks that the review focus on ethnic minority defendants and white British people in lower-income households, it is not introducing some alien or partisan concern. It is following the logic of the Secretary of State’s own work. If juries matter because they diffuse prejudice, open up decision making

crime
88
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

It is helpful to have a debate on new clause 29 for a very simple reason: if the Government insist on pressing ahead with clause 3, with all the constitutional, practical and equality concerns that surround it, the very least that Parliament should require is a proper, time-limited, evidence-based review of who has bee

crime
130
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)

“You don’t fix the backlog with trials that are widely perceived as unfair.”

crime
13
← PreviousPage 10 of 38 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.