The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 676 contributions

Speeches by Blake.

Every Hansard contribution by Rachel Blake this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 581600 of 676 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 30 of 34Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you suggest any particular remits that you think should be withdrawn? I share and am always interested in this critique of Government policy: things are always added and never taken away. The Committee is really interested to know whether there are specific remits that you would take away.

49
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have spent much of this session talking about the balance between risk and the impact on consumers. Earlier this year we saw the decrease in the maximum liability for repayments from £415,000 to £85,000. There was some discussion about what was driving that decision. Can you elaborate more on the trade-off between i

59
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Yes.

1
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you elaborate on your final point about deterring financial crime and protecting against it? What might this do to the people trying to commit fraud?

26
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

What would that look like?

5
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have been talking a bit about resilience, and one of the vulnerabilities outlined by the FCA is about capability. Where do you think the real responsibility lies for tackling that vulnerability in capability, in terms of financial education and awareness?

41
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

And if it does not have that role, where do you think that responsibility should lie?

16
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you suggest any particular remits that you think should be withdrawn? I share and am always interested in this critique of Government policy: things are always added and never taken away. The Committee is really interested to know whether there are specific remits that you would take away.

49
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have spent much of this session talking about the balance between risk and the impact on consumers. Earlier this year we saw the decrease in the maximum liability for repayments from £415,000 to £85,000. There was some discussion about what was driving that decision. Can you elaborate more on the trade-off between i

59
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Yes.

1
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you elaborate on your final point about deterring financial crime and protecting against it? What might this do to the people trying to commit fraud?

26
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

What would that look like?

5
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have been talking a bit about resilience, and one of the vulnerabilities outlined by the FCA is about capability. Where do you think the real responsibility lies for tackling that vulnerability in capability, in terms of financial education and awareness?

41
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

And if it does not have that role, where do you think that responsibility should lie?

16
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

This has been driven by a sense that fintech companies would be disadvantaged by the £415,000. On the number of claims, you have alluded to 99% being covered by the £85,000. So how do you think that change will balance innovation and risk taking?

44
27 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 416)

 You have talked about ramping up staff and training them in order to generate the additional income that you have anticipated. The additional income is really quite significant and, if this additional income does not materialise, we do get close to not meeting fiscal rules. Clearly, therefore,&#xa0

78
27 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 416)

 Are you able to say what kind of iterative correspondence you had with the OBR in terms of the confidence and risks around these estimates?

25
27 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 416)

 So if those yields are not generated, will it be the fault of HMRC?

14
27 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 416)

 Could you say which sector that is concentrated in?

9
27 Nov 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 416)

 On the point of supplementing and potentially needing to supplement, how are you assessing whether the fees are enough to expose the extent of money laundering?

26
← PreviousPage 30 of 34 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.