The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 603 contributions

Speeches by Blake.

Every Hansard contribution by Rachel Blake this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 501520 of 603 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 26 of 31Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 324)

It is probably something we would like to come on to with other witnesses, because you could create some quite challenging environments for people to have to accept. I wanted to come back to you a bit on the scams. You referred to the APP changes, saying that they were a bit watered down. Was that the movement from the

82
4 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 324)

Is there evidence that you could share with us about the impact of the £100 excess on older people? I am sure we would be interested to see it.

29
4 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 324)

You started to talk a bit about possible practical solutions to this and you started making the distinction between essential services and other services. I am interested in this topic, and the Committee is interested in putting forward practical solutions in our recommendations. There is clearly a challenge in terms o

86
4 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 324)

I wanted to come back to practical solutions and whether the current framework supports people with cash acceptance, particularly around energy bills. Do you have any evidence to share on cash payment for energy costs, and on whether people are forced into less advantageous tariffs? Is there any evidence on that? I am

60
4 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 324)

Is there a way to not be on a meter tariff and still pay in cash? If there is not, should there be?

23
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have been talking a bit about resilience, and one of the vulnerabilities outlined by the FCA is about capability. Where do you think the real responsibility lies for tackling that vulnerability in capability, in terms of financial education and awareness?

41
3 Dec 2024National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill

We have heard a lot this afternoon about investment in the public sector and what the proposals will do to small businesses, but we have not heard the Opposition recognise that this country needs a healthy workforce. The Bill proposes a sustainable and manageable approach to funding that healthy workforce. Will the hon

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobshealth
91
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you elaborate on your final point about deterring financial crime and protecting against it? What might this do to the people trying to commit fraud?

26
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Yes.

1
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have spent much of this session talking about the balance between risk and the impact on consumers. Earlier this year we saw the decrease in the maximum liability for repayments from £415,000 to £85,000. There was some discussion about what was driving that decision. Can you elaborate more on the trade-off between i

59
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you suggest any particular remits that you think should be withdrawn? I share and am always interested in this critique of Government policy: things are always added and never taken away. The Committee is really interested to know whether there are specific remits that you would take away.

49
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

This has been driven by a sense that fintech companies would be disadvantaged by the £415,000. On the number of claims, you have alluded to 99% being covered by the £85,000. So how do you think that change will balance innovation and risk taking?

44
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have spent much of this session talking about the balance between risk and the impact on consumers. Earlier this year we saw the decrease in the maximum liability for repayments from £415,000 to £85,000. There was some discussion about what was driving that decision. Can you elaborate more on the trade-off between i

59
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you suggest any particular remits that you think should be withdrawn? I share and am always interested in this critique of Government policy: things are always added and never taken away. The Committee is really interested to know whether there are specific remits that you would take away.

49
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

This has been driven by a sense that fintech companies would be disadvantaged by the £415,000. On the number of claims, you have alluded to 99% being covered by the £85,000. So how do you think that change will balance innovation and risk taking?

44
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Yes.

1
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

What would that look like?

5
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Can you elaborate on your final point about deterring financial crime and protecting against it? What might this do to the people trying to commit fraud?

26
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

What would that look like?

5
3 Dec 2024Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We have been talking a bit about resilience, and one of the vulnerabilities outlined by the FCA is about capability. Where do you think the real responsibility lies for tackling that vulnerability in capability, in terms of financial education and awareness?

41
← PreviousPage 26 of 31 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.