The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 922 contributions

Speeches by Holmes.

Every Hansard contribution by Paul Holmes this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 81100 of 922 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 5 of 47Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am not sure whether the hon. Gentleman is advocating new clause 19, but it is absolutely clear that three is too many. He may be willing to accept that there were three cases that were proven—as was the 2022 case in Eastleigh—but I do not think there should be any examples of voter fraud, and I certainly do not think

local-governmentother
329
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

Will the hon. Lady give way on that point?

local-governmentother
9
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dame Siobhain. The Minister outlined this group in some detail. The Opposition have many disagreements with the Bill, but this is an implementation clause, with amendments that are technical and needed to tweak the system, in essence, in order to carry this through. We

local-governmentother
148
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

We welcome the clause and the proportionate measures that the Minister is proposing. It goes without saying, and I think everybody across the Committee would accept, that vulnerable people in our society—who may be going through difficult circumstances through no fault of their own—should have the absolute right to reg

local-governmentother
134
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

We welcome the clause, but I have a couple of quick questions for the Minister. We must seriously consider anything that the Electoral Commission and electoral administrators have called for, and the Government have. The open register seems quite outdated and does not give the user or the person on it convenience or se

local-governmentother
233
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

I welcome the Minister outlining these measures. We agree with them, but I note the slight irony that the Minister has given examples of wanting to stop impersonation and disruptive candidates and to protect the integrity of the election system, when later in the Bill there is a watering down of identification requirem

local-governmentother
121
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman’s figures are slightly wrong. It was 0.8% of people who were not able to vote at the last general election due to being turned away without identification.

local-governmentother
30
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

With respect, the hon. Gentleman seems to have a varying acceptance of what is important and what is not. It was 0.8% of people who were turned away at the last general election. Witnesses have said that there was virtually no impersonation at polling stations during the general election. I can give the hon. Gentleman

local-governmentother
220
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

I do, and that is exactly why I am saying that it is ironic that the Government are watering down the ability to vote in an election, but want to increase the thresholds to stand in one. I believe in a universal approach, and that is clearly what the Government are not pursuing. That is what I meant.

local-governmentother
58
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

We welcome the clause. It has common sense and provides the ability for political parties, no matter what they are, to protect their reputation and integrity by clearly removing support from an election candidate who may have gone slightly skew-whiff. Let us face it: every party in this House—and outside it—has wrong ’

local-governmentother
159
26 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fifth sitting)

We support the clause and think it a pragmatic and proportional response to the other legislative changes that the Minister has outlined. We all know what happened before—candidates would have to run around to get 10 signatures, although that figure went down to two signatures under the last Government. That was a good

local-governmentother
165
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dame Siobhain. I thank the Minister for giving us an extensive and very in-depth description of what those technical clauses—7 to 14—outline. I cannot claim to do those clauses credit in the way the Minister has. I will just briefly ask a number of questions on those t

local-governmenttechnologyother
607
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

As we have heard, the clause establishes a duty for local authorities in Great Britain to raise awareness and provide assistance to certain young people— particularly those who are looked after by the local authority, and those who are eligible for continuing care—in registering to vote. While the intention to support

local-governmenttechnologyother
566
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

My hon. Friend is absolutely correct. As I say, this Minister is a Minister of integrity, but I find this out in opposition. I work for a shadow Secretary of State; the Minister works for the Secretary of State. On a number of occasions, the Secretary of State has been found to have said things in the Chamber that have

local-governmenttechnologyother
368
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am pretty agnostic about new clause 44 because I think it is quite vague, but I understand the reason it has been tabled. Earlier I outlined a concern that I do not believe the education system is quite yet able to make sure that our younger people get the education that they should have before they vote in a nationa

local-governmenttechnologyother
213
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

Will the Minister give way briefly one more time?

local-governmenttechnologyother
9
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

My hon. Friend is absolutely correct. Let us not forget that in very recent history the Government have completely ignored the view of the Electoral Commission anyway. When the Government said that they would not cancel local elections, and then did, and then got found out in court and did not defend the case, the Elec

local-governmenttechnologyother
441
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

My hon. Friend raises a good point that I had not thought of, as is normally the case. I am concerned that the political leadership have not given their sign-off or their thoughts, and that this Committee should be given the views of the Northern Ireland Administration. Having briefly served as a shadow Northern Irelan

local-governmenttechnologyother
438
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

I want to add another one, if that is possible. The Minister is being most generous, and she has shown utter determination not to accept new clause 44. Does she think there is merit in reviewing how this new enfranchisement will work, perhaps through existing mechanisms when there is a review of how a general election

local-governmenttechnologyother
129
24 Mar 2026Representation of the People Bill (Fourth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 26, in clause 17, page 23, line 23, at end insert— “(f) if the person’s existence has been properly verified using three separate datasets used for national and local data matching.” This amendment requires the registration officer to register certain electors only when their existence has been

local-governmenttechnologyother
57
← PreviousPage 5 of 47 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.