Speeches by Reader.
Every Hansard contribution by Mike Reader this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 141–160 of 984 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Hinkley Point C is being delivered under a contracts for difference and Sizewell C under the RAB model. Do you think that RAB is an appropriate model for the SMR programme?” | 31 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Given that RAB would expose consumers to paying for construction costs and construction risk and that the first of a kind model used on SMRs means that we do not really know how much they are going to cost to build, is it appropriate for taxpayers to hold that liability?” | 50 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “In terms of the UK’s nuclear supply chain, how exposed are we to China?” | 14 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “What does “more costly” mean? If the strike price is astronomical compared to renewables and gas, are the Government prepared to walk away from SMR if it is disproportionately expensive to consumers?” | 32 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Sam, what is being done in the Department to reduce the risk that China poses to UK security?” | 18 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “You do not know. Would it be in the contract that you would if it does not deliver on what it said?” | 22 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “In theory, we could be paying extremely high prices to be the first of a kind. It does not appear like the Government would step away from that decision on SMR if the price paid by consumers for the strike price is considerably larger than renewables.” | 46 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “You have signed a contract with it without a contractual arrangement to deliver the 70%.” | 15 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Is there a threshold at which you would consider removing the contract from Rolls-Royce, for example 50% or 40%?” | 19 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Sorry, I was asking Sam in terms of the Department. Is there a focus in your Department to make sure that that manufacturing base is delivered, as well as delivering the actual onsite nuclear and the regulatory changes?” | 38 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “I mean China being in the manufacturing supply chain. What work is done in the Department to reduce that risk?” | 20 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | Topical Questions “The potential rapid closure of St Andrew’s hospital in my constituency puts over 3,000 jobs at risk. Will the Secretary of State meet me to discuss what package of support we can put in place for those people to ensure they can find good quality work in my constituency?” labour-marketsocial-careeconomy-jobs | 49 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “I am just trying to understand the global perspective here. You have talked about the Czech Republic and America; I have just done a quick search, and Rolls-Royce is working in Turkey; there is SMR in Canada, India, and the Middle East, all of which are first of a kind. Why is the industry delivering so many pilot sche…” | 129 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Are we paying for the first of a kind, in terms of the Government investment to support you? Is the Czech Republic? Is Turkey? I have just read on your website that it has an SMR programme with Rolls-Royce. Are all the Governments paying a bit of money to you to fund your R&D?” | 54 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “When you say localisation, do you mean built in Britain rather than built by British-owned companies?” | 16 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Alastair, we are going to talk a bit about the supply chain, starting with Rolls-Royce SMR. Can you explain to us what a 70% British-built supply chain means in layman’s terms?” | 31 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Is that by volume, as in the number of contracts, or by value in terms of pounds?” | 17 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “The whole delivery, including construction and operations?” | 7 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “Of the contracts you have placed to date, what percentage are with British firms? You can always write to us if you do not know this.” | 26 |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 735) “I should declare a potential or perceived conflict; I worked in the supply chain bidding for work with Rolls-Royce SMR and some of the others that have given evidence. My former firm is one of the firms named on the latest press release. Looking at your online presence, it depends on how you define British content. You…” | 138 |