The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,270 contributions

Speeches by Shanks.

Every Hansard contribution by Michael Shanks this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 9811,000 of 1,270 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 50 of 64Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
11 Feb 2025Cost of Energy

I had a segue planned in my speech that was going to get me to the hon. Gentleman’s point, but he pre-empted me, and he is quite right to do so. He is right. This is a real challenge. The switch-off is the right thing for us to do in the long term—I think that everyone agrees that as a system that is outdated—but we do

energycost-of-livingenvironment
1,065
11 Feb 2025Cost of Energy

I was not expecting the hon. Gentleman to stop at that point. I saw him in his place earlier and knew that I would talk about community benefits. I will turn now to the points about community energy and community benefits; both are important. On community benefits, in all of this, we want to bring communities with us o

energycost-of-livingenvironment
331
11 Feb 2025Cost of Energy

Never will it be said that I enjoy criticising the former Government. I would flip what the hon. Member for Bath says on its head: that change also presents a real opportunity to look at the electricity system in a different way—I will come back to that point, particularly on community energy. It is right to say that t

energycost-of-livingenvironment
509
11 Feb 2025Cost of Energy

The hon. Gentleman makes a very good point. Upgrading the grid is important for transmitting the clean power that we want to generate in the future, but it is already 50 or 60 years old, and it is creaking under the pressures it has operated under for a very long time. There is real need to upgrade the grid right acros

energycost-of-livingenvironment
185
11 Feb 2025Cost of Energy

indicated assent.

energycost-of-livingenvironment
2
11 Feb 2025Cost of Energy

I will not, because I am going to come to the point made by the hon. Member. He has made the point about a highland pricing formula in the past—he is very reasonable about the issue—and it is something we will look at. The reform to the energy market will be part of that work as well. I am afraid I do not have time to

energycost-of-livingenvironment
201
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

I agree with the hon. Gentleman’s point, and I reiterate that we wish we were not in the position we were in when we came into government, whereby this was the only option that would deliver security of supply out to the early 2030s. We have sought to get the best possible deal for sustainability and for bill payers, b

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
190
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

The hon. Gentleman makes an important point, although I would gently point out that the shadow Minister and I agree on a lot more than he likes to pretend—or I like to pretend, perhaps. The hon. Gentleman is right to say that we are aware of the importance of the jobs at this particular power station and in the supply

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
117
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

My hon. Friend makes the point for me. He forgets, of course, that the Conservatives are under new management, so it is all fine—we just forget everything that happened in the last 14 years and move on. Of course, we have had to pick up the pieces from the last 14 years, and while the Conservatives will not take respon

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
161
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

That is good to know. I am proud that, as a country, we have moved past coal-fired power generation, which is incredibly destructive for our environment. We closed the last coal power station, at Ratcliffe-on-Soar, last year. Its workforce proudly recognised the role they played in powering the country for many years,

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
89
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

The point of having an independent adviser is that, while the role of the Low Carbon Contracts Company as the counterparty to the contract for difference we have agreed and the role of Ofgem as a regulator are incredibly important, we think there is also a role for someone independent to make sure they are analysing th

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
168
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

The right hon. Gentleman will not draw me into the ongoing competition on small modular reactors, but he has made the case for his preferred company. Last week, the Prime Minister announced that we have a new commitment to reviewing the 2011 planning statement so that we can have much more new nuclear across the UK. Th

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
130
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

I can give my hon. Friend that assurance. We have significantly reduced the ability of Drax to make profits, but we have also ensured that if there are excess profits, they are clawed back on behalf of the British people. The additional rates of 30% and 60% in the mechanism that we have designed will ensure that any un

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
109
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

We do not have a mechanism to claw back past profits from any company—that is not something that Governments are able to do. What we can do is move forward with a fair system that reduces the subsidy considerably, and has excess profit mechanisms and a windfall tax in place to ensure that if the company generates addit

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
96
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

My hon. Friend is right that one of the really important outcomes of the new deal is that instead of cheaper wind and solar power being displaced by Drax when it operated with baseload capacity, Drax will only operate when we need it on the system. That means that the cheaper, cleaner power sources that we are building

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
154
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

My hon. Friend is right that this is a good deal, in the short term, to ensure security of supply into the early-2030s, which was key to NESO’s advice on the basis of security of supply. In the process, however, we have sought to halve the subsidy that Drax was given by the previous Government and deliver on the sustai

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
122
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

After an urgent question and a statement, I hope that I will not still be standing here in 15 years’ time, and I suspect the House will support that. Let me be really clear. I do not remember Drax being the poster child for the clean energy transition. I have outlined clearly why this decision is important in terms of

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
153
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

My hon. Friend summarises the importance of the deal clearly. We have limited the expected rate of return for Drax to a level below that of monopolies regulated by Ofgem. We have halved the subsidies provided to Drax that were in every single deal from the Conservative party, year after year, saving £170 million each y

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
109
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

At the risk of getting into trouble with those responsible for tax matters, I simply say that this is a windfall mechanism that does exactly the same thing, and it does exactly what the Conservatives failed to do in 14 years, which is to ensure that there is a good deal and good value for money for the British public,

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
111
10 Feb 2025Biomass Generation

The right hon. Gentleman is right that we want “credible low carbon alternatives”. I will look at the specific points he mentions, but we do not see such generators as key to the review we want to undertake. We want to look at carbon capture and other technologies and, crucially, how we store some of the renewable ener

energyenvironmentfiscal-policy
106
← PreviousPage 50 of 64 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.