The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 646 contributions

Speeches by McEvoy.

Every Hansard contribution by Lola McEvoy this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 401420 of 646 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 21 of 33Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Mr Johnson?

2
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

I wanted to come back on your international comparisons, Dr Saleheen. Obviously, we are obsessed with the data and the inaccuracy on this Committee, because so many policies are being made, but if you have some good examples of other economies that have bounced back quicker and a bit more specific detail on how they ha

91
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

With productivity specifically and the bounce back.

7
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

We will have to get you back in when we get the next one, to see who is right.

19
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Ms Curtice, you just said that the changes to PIP will result in an 18% drop in the income of recipients. Can you elaborate on that? PIP is not means-tested, and some people are in work, so I do not understand how you could say that a fixed amount of money would equate to 18%.

55
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

For your organisation, obviously there is some significant missing data from the analysis that you have made, so why make it?

21
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Right. So when you saw the reforms that were outlined in the White Paper, the Green Paper and the spring statement, was there anything missing that you would have liked to see as an organisation—anything that you were screaming at the telly that you wished to see to help support people back into work or to balance the

61
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

What about changes to the broader welfare system? Rather than changes to the Government’s decisions, is there anything that you would have liked to see reformed?

26
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Okay. So you agree with the changes to eligibility and you agree with the universal credit rebalancing—

17
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Yes; we don’t know yet. Okay. I think that it says in an extract from your analysis that you have previously called for the same rebalancing as the DWP did in its Green Paper. Was there anything else that you were pleased to see?

44
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Okay, thank you. Mr Johnson, this is your last appearance before the Committee, so I will give you free rein to tell us what you liked about the spring statement and the changes to welfare. What would you support?

39
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Just to bring it back to welfare, is there anything that you—either personally or as an organisation lead at the IFS—have been calling for over time that you would have liked to see being reformed in the welfare changes that we are bringing in?

44
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Just a final question: for clarity, what were you saying about the two-child benefit cap?

15
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

And on that, can you give us your analysis on double-counting in that initial impact assessment, on how those things will interact, and on the severity for people with lifelong conditions and how that will interact with it as well, please?

41
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

We all watched your webinar, and you outlined the three risks facing the country and the economy as productivity, interest rates and global trade. We will just dig a bit deeper into your productivity analysis. In chart 1.1 of the EFO we see the trend productivity level graph. I think it is accepted that productivity ha

131
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Obviously, you said that population growth is half a million higher, and that brings down our productivity level, which is GDP divided by the workforce. What are those people doing, and why have they not been working at a level that would have brought the productivity level up? Is the half a million all immigration? Wh

63
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

We are saying that productivity is going to increase by the end of the forecast, but it is permanently below the October forecast. I just want to dig a bit deeper into why it will be permanently lower.

38
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Does anybody else on the panel have anything to add on that productivity point?

14
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Just a final question from me on that, is our current productivity measure fit for purpose? We are making a lot of national policies that are significantly impacting people’s lives based on this productivity puzzle. What do you think we could do as a Committee, or as a Government, to improve how we are measuring produc

56
1 Apr 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (2025-04-01)

Just a quick one from me. Going back to GDP and the way in which we measure productivity, household expenditure is the largest section of GDP. Is the productivity problem linked to the cost of living crisis, and the cost of living crisis scarring? We know wages are increasing but it will take a bit of time before peopl

100
← PreviousPage 21 of 33 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.