Speeches by Farnsworth.
Every Hansard contribution by Linsey Farnsworth this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 261–280 of 529 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “How might some of the practical challenges be tackled for section 28 going forward? For example, in the first session we heard about difficulties with shortage of barristers, particularly on the defence—the CPS has increased its numbers, but defence barristers are in short supply—and the practical difficulties that tha…” | 82 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Will the Leveson review look at section 28 specifically?” | 9 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “I think that in Texas they saw a reduction in recidivism as a result of the measures that they brought in, and in the overall crime rate. I am sure that you are hoping, but are you expecting that to be a similar outcome in this country?” | 47 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Is there any data around how evidence being given in that setting compares with other settings in other regions?” | 19 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Yes, I think we have really covered the whole of question 8, haven’t we? I will move on to my second question, which is looking to the future in terms of what we can learn. We have had research from the MOJ and from Professor Thomas. What research, if any, do the witnesses think should now be embarked upon within the s…” | 103 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Minister, the Committee has heard concerns about section 28, including the impact that it has on the court system, which we know is under a lot of pressure already and is stretched already. What would you say in relation to section 28 and the impact that it has on the court system, on the backlog and so on?” | 58 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “How might some of the practical challenges be tackled for section 28 going forward? For example, in the first session we heard about difficulties with shortage of barristers, particularly on the defence—the CPS has increased its numbers, but defence barristers are in short supply—and the practical difficulties that tha…” | 82 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Is there any data around how evidence being given in that setting compares with other settings in other regions?” | 19 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Minister, the Committee has heard concerns about section 28, including the impact that it has on the court system, which we know is under a lot of pressure already and is stretched already. What would you say in relation to section 28 and the impact that it has on the court system, on the backlog and so on?” | 58 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Will the Leveson review look at section 28 specifically?” | 9 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Good afternoon. My name is Linsey Farnsworth. I am the Member of Parliament for Amber Valley. My interests are as declared on the register, but of relevance to today, I was a Crown prosecutor, although I do not think Chris Hartley and myself ever crossed paths at that time.” | 49 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “On the subject of the Sentencing Bill, some of the measures in the sentencing Bill are based on a model in Texas that has had some results in relation to reoffending rates and in relation to the crime rate overall. Could you tell us a bit about that and what you are hoping for as an outcome from the sentencing Bill in …” | 74 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Would you accept, then, that that is a flaw in the methodology?” | 12 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Can I ask a very quick question? Apologies, I have not looked at the methodology, so this might be a silly question. If you have five charges and there are four acquittals and one conviction, so you have five different victims but the conviction was somebody who had not given evidence by section 28 and the others had, …” | 74 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “I think that in Texas they saw a reduction in recidivism as a result of the measures that they brought in, and in the overall crime rate. I am sure that you are hoping, but are you expecting that to be a similar outcome in this country?” | 47 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Are there any plans to change the rules on speaking to jurors about whether they felt that that had an impact on their decision making?” | 25 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “One of the witnesses mentioned the disparity of payments for barristers, depending on whether they are doing prosecution or defence work for section 28, so I hope that that is looked at as well. Minister, in your letter to the Committee on 7 March, you committed to keeping the operation of section 28 under review. Coul…” | 65 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “We have just heard that one of the practical challenges is that sometimes the cases where there is pre-recorded cross-examination go to the bottom of the list in the court backlog. Are there any other practical challenges to implementing section 28, particularly practical challenges during trials? What is the situation…” | 74 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “Good afternoon. My name is Linsey Farnsworth. I am the Member of Parliament for Amber Valley. My interests are as declared on the register, but of relevance to today, I was a Crown prosecutor, although I do not think Chris Hartley and myself ever crossed paths at that time.” | 49 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1280) “That leads me to two very different questions but both arising out of what you have just said. The first is whether those challenges with cases across court and limitations on number of barristers is having an impact negatively on the court backlog, which we know is a big problem in any event. The other is that you men…” | 140 |