The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 451 contributions

Speeches by Atkinson.

Every Hansard contribution by Lewis Atkinson this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 321340 of 451 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 17 of 23Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
18 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting)

That is exactly right. That will quite possibly include people’s individual homes as well as not in their homes, in places of appropriate care and peace and tranquillity.

healthsocial-care
28
18 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting)

The right hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. Another point we have not yet mentioned is that the Care Quality Commission regulates healthcare on the basis of location of delivery. Hospice services cannot just be provided from a random place: the place has to be registered with the CQC as suitable for the provision. I

healthsocial-care
63
18 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting)

Could the hon. Gentleman help us by giving some more examples of when the new clause would apply? For example, would it apply to supported housing schemes or nursing homes that are a person’s normal place of residence and, indeed, home?

healthsocial-care
41
18 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting)

To me, amendment 430, tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Bexleyheath and Crayford, strikes the right balance. Under clause 30 the Secretary of State “may” make provision for codes of practice on these matters if that is required; I am uncomfortable with saying that the Secretary of State “must” do so, when it is l

healthsocial-care
146
18 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Sir Roger. I will cover a few of the amendments, and follow on from my hon. Friend the Member for Stroud, whose points I broadly agree with. When it comes to the location and, actually, a lot of the elements, I fear we are trying to over-specify practical matters. As in s

healthsocial-care
408
18 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-fifth sitting)

My hon. Friend is absolutely right and articulated that better than I was managing to.

healthsocial-care
15
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

No, I am in a flow, so I am just going to keep going. I am mainly rebutting at this point, and I do not want to open the debate that much wider. Invariably, we already have individuals at the end of their lives with multidisciplinary input that is appropriate to them, and we have heard already how the independent docto

healthsocial-care
222
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I am going to continue this point, if I may. The hon. Member for East Wiltshire asked what the purpose of the panel is. As is set out very clearly in new clause 21, it is about determining eligibility for assistance, with reference to the stringent rules and conditions that we will lay out in the Bill. The hon. Gentlem

healthsocial-care
311
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for that point, but when someone cannot describe any version of safeguards that would be possible, and in the light of some of the other conversations we have had, one is led to believe, entirely respectfully, that some people are opposed to the Bill in principle in any instance. The point that

healthsocial-care
187
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I rise to respond to some of the points made by the hon. Member for East Wiltshire. I looked back on the Hansard report of the Second Reading debate and his position there, and I am somewhat confused. In his speech in that debate, he was entirely dismissive of the judge as a safeguard, but now, in Committee, he seems t

healthsocial-care
103
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

The hon. Gentleman says that the way to proceed would have been to strengthen, through amendment, the existing High Court safeguard. I may have missed them, but I cannot see amendments in his name that do that, so will he explain what strengthening of the High Court safeguard he would prefer?

healthsocial-care
51
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

rose—

healthsocial-care
1
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

The hon. Lady sketches out a very short exchange. Does she think that we should specify in primary legislation the exact nature of interactions in these sorts of matters elsewhere—in the High Court, employment tribunals and so on? In my understanding, we do not: we trust regulated professionals to have appropriate inte

healthsocial-care
73
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for his intervention, but I am afraid he is confused. It goes to the Court of Protection when the individual is not capable of making that decision and there is a dispute about what the best-interests decision may be for that individual. That is entirely different from the dying person saying, “

healthsocial-care
574
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

My hon. Friend is making a thoughtful speech. Has he had the chance to consider the situation with mental health tribunals that I mentioned yesterday, which usually do not take evidence under oath? Clearly, they make very serious decisions regarding sectionings and deprivations of liberty without invoking oath-taking p

healthsocial-care
49
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

I am not going to pursue that exact line of argument. The point of discussion, and the point of the vote, is whether we think this proposal, which, to me, is robust—the panel “must hear” from doctors and “must…hear” from the patient unless there are exceptional circumstances, and three professionals are involved—is str

healthsocial-care
96
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship this afternoon, Ms McVey. I feel that we are dancing on the head of a pin, but I oppose the amendment. Members across the debate have recognised that, as Dr Sarah Cox from the Association for Palliative Medicine said, it is always for the patient to decide. As my hon. Frie

healthsocial-care
339
11 Mar 2025Prison Capacity

The prison capacity crisis that this Government inherited has resulted in persistent offenders not feeling the deterrent effect of a custody option being realistically available. Can the Minister tell us how this Government’s prison building plans will restore a level of deterrence to the system and ensure that capacit

crimeeconomy-jobs
60
11 Mar 2025Prison Capacity

16. What steps her Department is taking to increase prison capacity.

crimeeconomy-jobs
11
11 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty First sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way at the end of an excellent speech. Does he agree that the provision in new schedule 2 that allows the commissioner, who would be a sitting or previous judge, to give guidance and set procedure for the operation of panels would answer some of the concerns raised by those who think t

healthsocial-care
73
← PreviousPage 17 of 23 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.