The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 553 contributions

Speeches by Malthouse.

Every Hansard contribution by Kit Malthouse this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 441460 of 553 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 23 of 28Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
30 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventh sitting)

Q We have heard a lot in evidence over the last two or three days about how the doctor should approach the initial conversation and whether doctors should be allowed to initiate a conversation about assisted dying. I realise that each of you has experienced this at second hand, but could you talk a bit about how those

healthsocial-care
446
30 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventh sitting)

Q My question is to Dr Richards. Obviously health service medics are dealing with end-of-life situations at the moment—they are withdrawing treatment or declining to give treatment if they think it is futile. In those circumstances there are a set of safeguards. How do those safeguards compare with the safeguards in th

healthsocial-care
127
30 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventh sitting)

Q Professor Hoyano, I am interested to explore your views on the third layer. I understand your view about the Court of Protection, but we have heard in previous evidence, not least from eminent members of your profession, that the Spanish model of a panel of experts might be an option worth examining. In those circums

healthsocial-care
943
30 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixth sitting)

Doctors? Professor Blake: In Western Australia, which was the second jurisdiction to introduce voluntary assisted dying—

healthsocial-care
16
30 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixth sitting)

Q But how did you approach that in the legislation? Is it silent as to what doctors should do, or does it have a prescription? Alex Greenwich: Yes. In our legislation we make it clear that the doctor has to make sure that the patient is aware of their palliative care options, and we have referral pathways for psychosoc

healthsocial-care
99
30 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Sixth sitting)

Q I want to go back to the issue of gag clause/doctor initiation. Alex, could you quickly talk to us about the thought processes? Can you say why some states introduced it and why you did not? How in legislation have you circumscribed the way doctors should approach this with patients? Perhaps our two medical guests co

healthsocial-care
292
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Q We have heard from earlier witnesses, particularly from other jurisdictions, that training is the key. Is it therefore your view that in guidelines, for example, specific training in this area could be effective? Richard Robinson: We take calls from professionals all the time, and we give training all the time. Safeg

healthsocial-care
111
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Q196 Thank you all for coming. Clause 26 will create a new offence of coercion. In your view, is that offence correctly drawn? Is 14 years long enough as a deterrent? Professor Esmail: In all honesty, I had not thought about it like that. I cannot say—I do not have the expertise to know—whether it is deterrence. I thin

healthsocial-care
446
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Q Lord Sumption, I heard an interview with you on the radio, I think before Christmas, in which you expressed doubts about the third layer at the High Court. We heard evidence earlier that there is an alternative route that might see more of a panel sitting, rather than a High Court judge. Could you expand on your view

healthsocial-care
132
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Q I may be speaking out of turn, but the sentiment of the House generally seems to be that there should be a third layer of supervision over the process. There are other territories have that third layer of supervision, such as Spain and Australia. Have you examined any of those, and is there a model that you think mig

healthsocial-care
244
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Q Thank you all for coming. We have had a lot of discussion over the last day or so about eligibility. I think it was Hospice UK that said, in evidence to the Health and Social Care Committee, that pain in all circumstances could be alleviated. Do you believe that the way in which the Bill is framed captures those peop

healthsocial-care
310
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fifth sitting)

Q How would you seek to improve the Bill in order to make them eligible? Dr Hussain: I think it is really complex, isn’t it? The very existence of the Bill affects everyone who needs end-of-life care. It opens a Pandora’s box of risk. For those people, absolutely—when I am a physician and I am in front of them, I think

healthsocial-care
521
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fourth sitting)

Q Could you talk us through eligibility with regard to neurodegenerative diseases, and whether you have in place any variations and considerations for things such as Parkinson’s or motor neurone disease? Is the main delivery mechanism for VAD in Australia the mainstream health service, or is it delivered through a sepa

healthsocial-care
55
29 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Fourth sitting)

Sir Roger, can I ask about mainstream delivery?

healthsocial-care
8
28 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Second sitting)

Right, so professional judgment again—

healthsocial-care
5
28 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Second sitting)

Q I understand the BMA’s concern, but my concern is about saying, “Here’s a leaflet—you’re on your own,” or “You can get information from this place.” For somebody who is in extremis at that point in their life, that might prove a significant barrier. Would doctors reflect that in their sense of responsibility towards

healthsocial-care
81
28 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Second sitting)

Q I just want to clarify the referral issue. As I understand it—I may have it wrong—your 2013 guidance on medical practice and personal beliefs says that doctors should refer, in cases such as those of abortion, to a colleague or service provider rather than a general information source. Mark Swindells: I do not believ

healthsocial-care
110
28 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Second sitting)

Q In the run-up to Second Reading, we heard from some of the overseas experience that where there was effectively a gag clause on doctors, it was proving to be extremely difficult, and the medical profession felt that that was a big barrier to discharging its duties. Would you recognise that? Dr Green: Indeed. I believ

healthsocial-care
91
28 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Second sitting)

Q You are clear, though, that doctors should be free to have an open discussion with their patients about the whole variety of possibilities or paths that may be available to them as they face a terminal disease? Dr Green: As a general principle, I do not believe that unnecessary barriers should be put in the way of co

healthsocial-care
137
28 Jan 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Third sitting)

I, too, support the amendment proposed by the hon. Member for Spen Valley, and in particular the addition of Jane Monckton-Smith. I have read her book; it is definitely worth a read and is pretty alarming. I will address why I do not think the Committee should support the amendment to the amendment tabled to add other

healthsocial-care
158
← PreviousPage 23 of 28 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.