The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,031 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 301320 of 1,031 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 16 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Clause 4

crimesocial-care
2
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Dr Hodgson and Dr Thomason go on to say:

crimesocial-care
9
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Amendment proposed: 48, in clause 4, page 13, line 11, at end insert—

crimesocial-care
13
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

crimesocial-care
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I rise to speak in support of Opposition amendment 46, which is in my name, as we debate elements of the Government’s proposals to remove jury trials and make use of the new Crown court bench division in relation to potentially complex and lengthy trials. To make sense of this debate, we must consider how the measures

crimesocial-care
447
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

To make it really clear, what is the minimum length that the Minister thinks would constitute a lengthy case?

crimesocial-care
19
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The hon. Lady is absolutely right. The Minister is always keen to draw lessons from other jurisdictions, and as I said we have a clear lesson from another jurisdiction that is specific. In our system, my understanding is that the practice directions for complex cases are that the prosecution and defence should do every

crimesocial-care
1,366
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 49, in clause 4, page 13, line 30, leave out “trial beginning on or” and insert “cases whose first hearing in the magistrates’ court takes place”. This amendment prevents the provisions in section 4 coming into effect retrospectively. We previously discussed the issue of retrospectivity in claus

crimesocial-care
867
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

crimesocial-care
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I rise to speak in opposition to clause 4 and in support of amendment 51 in my name. I remind the Committee that this is not a new debate. As the Minister touched on, it is an idea that has been postponed, debated and largely rejected several times over the last few decades. Each time, the conclusion has been that the

crimesocial-care
812
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

crimesocial-care
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I am in danger of not knowing my figures, but I think the impact assessment suggests that 25% of cases in the list of offences will be included, so I am not sure whether it is reasonable to describe that as a small proportion—I do not know whether the Minister said “proportion” or “number”. How many cases does she thin

crimesocial-care
63
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

rose—

crimesocial-care
1
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

The same is true in other areas. Private prosecutions are used in intellectual property crime and shoplifting, where cases are not prioritised. In one example, public enforcement spent over £2 million and brought just a handful of charges, while private prosecutions secured over 100 convictions at a lower cost. If we m

crime
131
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

We must ensure that the consultation is meaningful, and it must include those who rely on private prosecutions. Crucially, the House will expect to see how the Government respond to the evidence they gather. If this becomes just a paper exercise and the Government continue with what they always intended to do, it will

crime
106
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

Where we have complete agreement—this was Tracey’s original campaign, supported by Victims For Justice—is on the idea of statutory notification, which is a welcome change. I will continue to work with any and all victims, even when they do not universally agree. People working in the justice arena are used to recognisi

crime
72
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

Similarly, we must understand what the “interests of justice” means in reality. In what sorts of scenario does the Minister expect people to be able to apply successfully? She helpfully pointed out that there is clearly a difference in the obligations towards an ordinary member of the public, or even an MP making use o

crime
217
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

Let me turn to controlling cost awards in private prosecutions. We will not be opposing Government amendment (a), which introduces a requirement for consultation and an impact assessment before those powers are exercised. That welcome step reflects concerns that have been raised consistently throughout the passage of t

crime
115
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

There will be some back and forth about who wants what elements of this scheme and in what ways, but I think the Minister was wrong to say that our focus was on it being for everybody. I have been clear from the start that our focus was also on extending the provision for victims and their families, and not for everybo

crime
62
20 Apr 2026Victims and Courts Bill

I agree with both of them that this measure is welcome, but we should not overstate the extent to which we are delivering exactly what victims and their families asked for. As has been said, these steps forward are welcome, but in some ways they are not exactly what families asked for. Tracey’s key point throughout has

crime
144
← PreviousPage 16 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.