The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,031 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 261280 of 1,031 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 14 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

crimesocial-care
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

rose—

crimesocial-care
1
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Just so the Committee is clear exactly what I said and what the Minister said in return, it was in response to an intervention from the hon. Member for Birmingham Erdington, who asked what it would take to get me to accept the Government’s position. I said: “If the Minister wants to intervene on me and say, ‘I am absol

crimesocial-care
264
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

crimesocial-care
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Question put, That the amendment be made.

crimesocial-care
7
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 47, in clause 4, page 11, line 1, leave out from “is” to end of line 2, and insert “a right of appeal against a decision to make an order under this section on the grounds of natural justice. (5A) where an appeal is made under subsection (5), it must not be heard by the judge who made the origin

crimesocial-care
409
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

In summary, the proposal for a Crown court bench division in complex and lengthy trials requires a robust mechanism for appeal on allocation if it is to be fair and effective. By including a right of appeal now, we would prevent the waste of resources associated with post-trial retrials, close the legal black hole crea

crimesocial-care
146
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I rise to speak in support of amendments 58 and 52; I will start with amendment 58. We find ourselves at a significant juncture in the history of our legal system, and the Government have presented us with a Bill framed primarily as a pragmatic response to the current record-breaking backlog of nearly 80,000 cases in o

crimesocial-care
2,151
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

As we are touching on these issues, those of us on the Opposition Benches are happy to say that we have to work harder on judicial accountability and decision making, and we are not afraid to say that we think it is better that juries do these things, because judges err. There is an irony really, because at the heart o

crimesocial-care
194
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

A right of appeal also acts as a check against case hardening. Although our judiciary has many positives, an appeal mechanism ensures that the pressure of the backlog does not subtly influence the application of the law in these circumstances. The right to challenge the forum of one’s trial is a fundamental safeguard a

crimesocial-care
94
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crimesocial-care
5
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The only point I would add is that, as the Minister has accepted, this is a relatively small number of cases, so the test of what is justifiable is actually disproportionately weighted against the Minister in these cases, in comparison with the earlier cases on clause 3. People’s rights and expectations remain the same

crimesocial-care
145
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I am in danger of not knowing my figures, but I think the impact assessment suggests that 25% of cases in the list of offences will be included, so I am not sure whether it is reasonable to describe that as a small proportion—I do not know whether the Minister said “proportion” or “number”. How many cases does she thin

crimesocial-care
63
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The Minister can probably anticipate what I am going to say: this situation is highly unsatisfactory, considering that we will again be asked to vote—not have a view or give an opinion, but be asked to vote—on the system of allocation and reallocation in relation to complex and lengthy trials. Members may have seen the

crimesocial-care
195
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I rise to speak to my amendment 53 and to amendment 13, tabled by the Liberal Democrat spokesperson, the hon. Member for Chichester. Clause 6 includes a provision that seeks to expand the Secretary of State’s power to vary the maximum custodial sentence that may be imposed by magistrates courts for triable either-way o

crimesocial-care
772
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

As I have said, evidence was raised with the Committee about the inconsistency with which this might be approached across the region. A right of appeal ensures that a body of case law is developed by the Court of Appeal, providing clear guidance on when a case must remain with a jury. The perception of fairness is vita

crimesocial-care
100
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

As I have talked about in earlier debates, uniquely in this situation we already know what the Lord Chancellor wanted to do. From leaks, we know that five years was the test, in terms of these proposals. The Opposition are being fair in suggesting that this is potentially the thin end of the wedge.

crimesocial-care
54
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Thank you, Ms Jardine, for taking the Chair as we continue this later sitting. Before we suspended, we were debating my amendment 53 to clause 6 in relation to the use of the negative procedure rather than the affirmative procedure to change sentencing powers. I was talking about the importance of considering the natur

crimesocial-care
926
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

Without this availability of judicial review and a specific right of appeal, we are asking defendants to accept a decision that is functionally unreviewable until—from their perspective—it is much too late. This lack of parity undermines the principle of legal certainty. The necessity of appeal in clause 4 is even grea

crimesocial-care
137
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

My hon. Friend the Member for Reigate has given one example, but another, with which I expect people will be familiar, is the LIBOR trials. They were very complicated and sophisticated, and the appeals were successful because of a judge. It was the judge’s misdirection to the jury that led to the LIBOR trials becoming

crimesocial-care
78
← PreviousPage 14 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.