Speeches by Mather.

“Clause 72”

“regulations about non-GBR infrastructure, facilities and services”

“(b) for ‘one another’ substitute ‘each other’.”

“This amendment is consequential on amendment 108.”

“Clause 73”

“Interpretation of Chapter 1 of Part 3”

“Absolutely. To build on my hon. Friend’s point, this is very much the start of the conversation, not the end of it, in thinking about how GBR can better integrate rail services that are run through mayoral strategic authorities with the wider network, with mayors of course being able to use funding for GBR services whe…”

““managed or operated by Great British Railways or a GBR company, but does not include any such infrastructure managed or operated on behalf of a person other than Great British Railways or a GBR company”.—(Keir Mather.)”

“This amendment would define GBR infrastructure so as to exclude infrastructure managed or operated by GBR or a GBR company on behalf of non-GBR companies from the definition of GBR infrastructure.”

“Clause 75”

“(a) for ‘the purposes of the co-operation required under subsection (1) above,’ substitute ‘purposes connected with passenger transport services for persons travelling to, from and within Greater London, Great British Railways,’, and”

“Amendment made: 109, page 44, line 6, at end insert “or a GBR company”.—(Keir Mather.)”

“This amendment would prevent the ORR from giving a direction to a GBR company under section 16A of the Railways Act 1993.”

“Clause 86”

““(5) In subsection (2)—”

“Amendments made: 110, page 51, line 10, leave out “or”.”

“This amendment and amendment 111 would expand the categories of property, rights and liabilities that could be transferred under a transfer scheme.”

“Amendment 111, page 51, line 11, after “services” insert—”

““or the management of land or other property formerly used in connection with the provision of such services,”.”

“I could not agree more strongly with the sentiments expressed by my hon. Friend. He will know—we have discussed this—that under the council’s current arrangements, two members have lived experience of navigating the transport network with a disability. We fully expect that arrangement to continue. I applaud the efforts…”