The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 450 contributions

Speeches by Narayan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kanishka Narayan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 181200 of 450 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 10 of 23Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1823)

The platforms have some transparency reporting at the moment and we still need to do more, at the very least in information sharing between platforms and across Government on the nature and source of the risks. Whether we should enforce particular standards of platforms reporting and attributing is a more open question

110
14 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1823)

As an offence, it is owned by the Home Office.

10
14 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1823)

Operationally, the Foreign Office. My colleague, Minister Doughty, has been very engaged with international engagement on the operational details on policy around disinformation—particularly around elections—that is owned by DSIT. I have engaged with a series of our allies across Europe, Australia, Canada, and beyond o

97
14 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1823)

On the diagnosis of this, the Foreign Office, the agencies, and the security context make a judgment on a case-by-case basis. I genuinely do not feel sufficiently informed on each of those judgments to say whether there is a broader culture where they are making those judgments consistently on the wrong side. I will no

59
14 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1823)

Platforms absolutely have to do as much as needed to engage on media literacy. I will say three things on this. First, the legal context in the Online Safety Act means that not only do they have to assess prospective risks but they have to consider mitigations—including media literacy interventions—that can mitigate th

221
14 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1823)

On the first question of whether it is an offence or not, ostensibly it feels totally wrong to me. Given the threshold set in the law, which is that you just need reasonable grounds to infer foreign interference, not conclusive proof of it, without pre-empting the individual cases, to me it would feel like there is a p

158
14 Apr 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1823)

There are two separate questions here. One is the question of who is responsible. You have rightly answered that yourself in that context: Ofcom is responsible for the implementation of the law. There is a separate question from responsibility, which is are the thresholds appropriate at the moment? First, as I mentione

89
23 Mar 2026Financial Assistance to Industry

I would not make claims about any individual-level investments we have made through the fund at the moment, but I am happy to write to the hon. Gentleman about the provisions in the fund as a whole. Central to our ambition is boosting manufacturing through the delivery of up to £520 million to the life sciences innovat

economy-jobshealthtechnology
647
23 Mar 2026Financial Assistance to Industry

I am happy to look into the specific case study in the papers, which the hon. Gentleman referenced. I have to say that I have not seen the mention in The Times of the company he talked about, and I am reluctant to speculate on the context. However, if he is looking for an answer, I am happy to write to him about that c

economy-jobshealthtechnology
211
23 Mar 2026Financial Assistance to Industry

I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the motion, That this House authorises the Secretary of State to make payments, by way of financial assistance under section 8 of the Industrial Development Act 1982, in excess of £30 million to any successful applicant to the Life Sciences Large Investment Portfolio, la

economy-jobshealthtechnology
244
23 Mar 2026Financial Assistance to Industry

I thank both hon. Members for their contributions. To respond to the hon. Member for Didcot and Wantage, the large investment portfolio part of the fund is of course focused on larger projects that materially move the needle for the sector as a whole. The life sciences innovative manufacturing fund as a whole is much m

economy-jobshealthtechnology
367
19 Mar 2026 Online Harms

I thank the hon. Member for St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire (Ian Sollom) for bringing this important debate to the House. A number of hon. Members have mentioned bereaved families, and I want to pay tribute to all those families. Ian Russell—with whom I have had a series of meetings, including this morning—Stuart and A

technologycrimehealth
1,562
18 Mar 2026Pornography: Regulation

I pay tribute to my hon. Friend’s engagement in her constituency and on this debate nationally. She has been a strong champion for the voices of victims, particularly in relation to this question. I entirely agree with her demands for parity, and that is exactly the commitment we have made as a Government. We have set

crimeculture-communityhealth
72
18 Mar 2026Pornography: Regulation

One of the defining impacts of this Government is the action that we are taking to tackle violence against women and girls, and that means making illegal online that which is illegal offline. Intimate image abuse is now a priority offence; cyber-flashing is a priority offence; nudification apps are being banned, and we

crimeculture-communityhealth
102
18 Mar 2026Pornography: Regulation

I thank the hon. Member for that incredibly important point. That is exactly why we have already made a series of legal changes, not least to ensure that cyber-flashing and intimate image abuse are priority offences under the Online Safety Act 2023. We have mandated highly effective age assurance on pornography sites a

crimeculture-communityhealth
88
18 Mar 2026Topical Questions

First, may I affirm the importance of the project that the right hon. Gentleman is talking about? The Government are backing the future of nuclear fusion across the country, and this site in particular has a huge contribution to make. Construction will be on its way by the end of the decade, with research and developme

technologyhealthenergy
82
11 Mar 2026 UK-based Tech Companies

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mr Betts. I thank the hon. Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) for securing this important debate on Government support for UK-based tech companies. I am grateful to him and to all other hon. Members across the Chamber for their contributions. They did a s

technologyeconomy-jobs
1,381
11 Mar 2026 UK-based Tech Companies

I have a 100% record so far of committing to visits when asked. I do not want to set too much of a precedent, but given the numbers in the room, I would be happy to take the hon. Member up on his kind offer as well. The hon. Member also made an important point about SME representation on trade missions; on the three in

technologyeconomy-jobs
1,342
10 Mar 2026 Technology Sovereignty

I valued my hon. Friend’s earlier point that sovereignty has to be seen in the round. We cannot make everything here; we have to look at the entire bundle that we have to offer. In the context of LLMs, there is some uncertainty as to whether all the capability will ultimately accrue in closed proprietary models, or whe

defenceeconomy-jobsother
946
10 Mar 2026 Technology Sovereignty

The hon. Member is absolutely right to raise that point about a defence for cyber-security purposes. The Computer Misuse Act is being reviewed at the moment—the Home Office is looking at it—but, as I mentioned in Committee on the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill, that is not the appr

defenceeconomy-jobsother
331
← PreviousPage 10 of 23 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.